search for: _ignore_

..., a 0/1 regresson with no intercept implies that the mean for the "0" group is zero, and with two regressors that the mean is zero for the (0,0) group. Looking at the data, this is quite clearly not the case. I suppose you may have intended to fit the models _with_ the intercept and then _ignore_ the intercept for plotting purposes, i.e. lm(y~x11+x12, Dataset)$coef[-1], etc.? (Also, I suspect that you don't actually have y=7 and y=867 in the dataset.) -pd > On 21 Feb 2023, at 22:33 , varin sacha via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > Dear R-experts, > &g...

Dear R-experts, Here below my R code working with quite a few warnings.? x11 and x12 are dichotomous variable (0=no and 1=yes). I substract 1 to ignore intercept. I would like not to ignore intercept. How to modify my R code because if I just remove -1 it does not work? y= c(32,45,65,34,23,43,65,76,87,98,7,867,56,45,65,76,88,34,55,66) x11=c(0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,1)

This adds coalescing of adjacent extents of the same type, as mentioned by Eric Blake in the commit message here: https://github.com/libguestfs/libnbd/commit/46072f6611f80245846a445766da071e457b00cd The patch series is rather long because it detours through adding the <vector.h> library from nbdkit into libnbd and replacing ad hoc uses of realloc, char ** etc in various places. Rich.

In the kernel and qemu communities it is routine for patches that will be backported to stable branches to be posted for review. I'm proposing we do the same for libguestfs stable branches. All of the attached have been tested with 'make check-release'. Rich.