search for: _if_

...rocess, using the formulae outlined at http://www.uwm.edu/~ziyu/ctc.pdf, page 5. First, is there a better exposition of a practical algorithm for doing this? I have not found an R package that does this specifically, nor anything on the web. Second, the script below will give the right answer, _if_ I "normalize" the rate matrix, so that the average rate is near 1.0, and _if_ I tweak the multiplier below (see **), and then watch for the Answer to converge to a matrix where the rows to sum to 1.0. (This multiplier is "t" in the PDF whose URL is above.) Is there a known w...

...mber of streams/files you wished to serve at the time the client d/l's the playlist. There are cases when you may wish to dynamically change what the client hears (live radio for instance, or maintenance, etc.) without requiring the client to manually reconnect. Redirects would/could be handy _IF_ clients supported them universally. Alas. Icecast supports moving clients to new streams (very cool BTW), and that serves the same purpose - although not as flexible as redirects could be (if the "new stream" was on a different Icecast instance (or computer) for example). Cheers and kee...

...what if we simply move SLOWPATH from .tail to .head? In this case arch_spin_unlock() could do xadd(tickets.head) and check the result In this case __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath() really needs to cmpxchg the whole .head_tail. Plus obviously more boring changes. This needs a separate patch even _if_ this can work. BTW. If we move "clear slowpath" into "lock" path, then probably trylock should be changed too? Something like below, we just need to clear SLOWPATH before cmpxchg. Oleg. --- x/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ x/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -109,7 +1...

...what if we simply move SLOWPATH from .tail to .head? In this case arch_spin_unlock() could do xadd(tickets.head) and check the result In this case __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath() really needs to cmpxchg the whole .head_tail. Plus obviously more boring changes. This needs a separate patch even _if_ this can work. BTW. If we move "clear slowpath" into "lock" path, then probably trylock should be changed too? Something like below, we just need to clear SLOWPATH before cmpxchg. Oleg. --- x/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ x/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -109,7 +1...

...-H ldap://dcXYZ.samdom.example.com -U Administrator on additional DCs). Not clear is: which Microsoft's ADMX templates for which MS-Server version? There're only MS-Windows Server 2016 and MS-Windows Server 2008/R2 listed, but no eg. 2016, 2019 or 2022 ... Plus another question on this: _if_ I have install the ADMX eg. for 2022, does I have to install those ADMX-versions on every MS quarterly H-update pack again? Cheers, Torsten

...ng and will be responsible for maintaining 64-bit Centos 5 systems. For desktop use, I'm debating between 32 and 64-bit versions. I know such applications, such as flash for firefox, are first honed for 32-bit systems, then evolve for 64-bit. What other obstacles could I expect to face _if_ I chose 64-bit over 32-bit for the desktop? I'd be installing on an 8 GB dual core high-end Dell desktop. Thanks. Scott

On 02/11, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > On 02/10/2015 06:56 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> In this case __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath() really needs to cmpxchg >> the whole .head_tail. Plus obviously more boring changes. This needs a >> separate patch even _if_ this can work. > > Correct, but apart from this, before doing xadd in unlock, > we would have to make sure lsb bit is cleared so that we can live with 1 > bit overflow to tail which is unused. now either or both of head,tail > lsb bit may be set after unlock. Sorry, can't unders...

On 02/11, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > On 02/10/2015 06:56 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> In this case __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath() really needs to cmpxchg >> the whole .head_tail. Plus obviously more boring changes. This needs a >> separate patch even _if_ this can work. > > Correct, but apart from this, before doing xadd in unlock, > we would have to make sure lsb bit is cleared so that we can live with 1 > bit overflow to tail which is unused. now either or both of head,tail > lsb bit may be set after unlock. Sorry, can't unders...

...es, but those are mainly for GPOs on Linux. > > Not clear is: > which Microsoft's ADMX templates for which MS-Server version? > There're only MS-Windows Server 2016 and MS-Windows Server 2008/R2 > listed, but no eg. 2016, 2019 or 2022 ... > Plus another question on this: _if_ I have install the ADMX eg. for > 2022, does I have to install those ADMX-versions on every MS quarterly > H-update pack again? You only need to cover the settings you are using in your GPOs with ADMX files that define those settings. As long as you don't change your GPOs (and add ne...

...? If not, the printer on the server get renamed with how the driver wants to name it - When the above happens, I have only found the ability to delete the printer from windows, I have'n't found a rpcclient (or similar) to delete the printer (ie addprinter opposite) - Lastly, what happens _if_ two separate print drivers have a same file name? Everything gets tucked into the same directory?? Thank You - Chris

...> labelefi > > # e2label /dev/vda2 > labelboot > > # e2label /dev/vda3 > labelroot > > # swaplabel /dev/vda4 > LABEL: labelswap > ... > > > Filesystem *label* and *label* of a swap area > distinguish from > GPT *name* of a partition > _If_ I understand Erwan's patch correctly, we are talking about the GPT Partition Name, not the filesystem's label (but I could be wrong). > > Therefore -if- you are referring to a GPT partition *name*, > simple *name* as append option - for GPT partition *name* selection, should...

Is it possible to use DTrace to display the number of arguments and their types for userland or kernel functions that are not explicitly instrumented or documented by their authors? We''re talking about functions provided by Veritas VxVM/VxFS and the like, and for example, we might want to try tracing I/Os from App => VxFS => VxVM => ssd driver to see where I/Os get aggregated or

...;>> >>> Not clear is: >>> which Microsoft's ADMX templates for which MS-Server version? >>> There're only MS-Windows Server 2016 and MS-Windows Server 2008/R2 >>> listed, but no eg. 2016, 2019 or 2022 ... >>> Plus another question on this: _if_ I have install the ADMX eg. for >>> 2022, does I have to install those ADMX-versions on every MS >>> quarterly H-update pack again? >> >> You only need to cover the settings you are using in your GPOs with >> ADMX files that define those settings. As long as y...

raf wrote: > Warlich, Christof wrote: > > ... > > I want to be able to ssh to all internal hosts that live in the internal.sub.domain.net, > > i.e. that are only accessible through the internal.sub.domain.net jumphost without > > having to list each of these hosts somewhere, as they may frequently be added or > > removed from the internal domain and without being

...; for GPOs on Linux. >> >> Not clear is: >> which Microsoft's ADMX templates for which MS-Server version? >> There're only MS-Windows Server 2016 and MS-Windows Server 2008/R2 >> listed, but no eg. 2016, 2019 or 2022 ... >> Plus another question on this: _if_ I have install the ADMX eg. for >> 2022, does I have to install those ADMX-versions on every MS quarterly >> H-update pack again? > > You only need to cover the settings you are using in your GPOs with ADMX > files that define those settings. As long as you don't change...

...nd between CPUs by the scheduler pretty freely (more so than one would thing), and the result is that you can''t assume that the sending CPU will be reasonably static for a given flow. (I gotta think this wreaks havoc on the caches involved... but that''s a different problem.) _If_ transmitted packets are sent to the stack and always land in a delivery queue, then perhaps the outbound queue (squeue?) can have a worker thread that doesn''t migrate around. But in order for that to happen, we have to stop having sending threads deliver right to the driver driver whe...

hypothetically, i have 2 different textures, one names TX_Skin, another named tx_skin. a plugin calls TX_SKIN, which texture does it choose?

I knew I'd regret leaving that option in for the MIPS port back in 99. Basically this is the only acceptable way for mcpu to exist, but should never have been added to the GCC aarch64 port at all since there's no compatibility with existing build systems to worry about. I would still like you to show this mythical piece of software that needs this compatibility. -eric On Jan 8, 2014 3:06

...tail value, unless we're the tail, in which case we clear the tail. > 2). Once we are done, we poke the other CPU (the one that linked to > us) by writting to node->locked (below) so they can make progress and > loop on lock->val changing from _Q_LOCKED_MASK to zero). _If_ there was another cpu, ie. the tail didn't point to us. --- I don't do well with natural language comments like that; they tend to confuse me more than anything.

...tail value, unless we're the tail, in which case we clear the tail. > 2). Once we are done, we poke the other CPU (the one that linked to > us) by writting to node->locked (below) so they can make progress and > loop on lock->val changing from _Q_LOCKED_MASK to zero). _If_ there was another cpu, ie. the tail didn't point to us. --- I don't do well with natural language comments like that; they tend to confuse me more than anything.