search for: _idea_

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_idea_".

2007 Apr 11
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM Roadmap 2007-2008, PowerPC, multithreading, LLVM 2.0, etc ?
...they are > needed. Lately it seems that this means lots of inline asm bug fixes. :) > In the next month or two, I'd like to finish up our C++ EH implementation, > ideally for 2.0, but (again) no promises :). well, it should be definitely not about promises at all, but about getting _idea_ where LLVM currently is and where it is going to. Many ppl outside of LLVM development process will not bother big LLVM guys-n-girls via chat. And they likely to go on with their business further without getting a right point about how cool LLVM is, and how cool LLVMdevers going to make LLVM in...
2007 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Roadmap 2007-2008, PowerPC, multithreading, LLVM 2.0, etc ?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Valery Khamenya wrote: > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will finish a project that they start, we
2007 Apr 10
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM Roadmap 2007-2008, PowerPC, multithreading, LLVM 2.0, etc ?
Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also
2008 Mar 03
5
on the philosophical aspects of a specification
a specification will _eventually_ be used, by someone, to tell the user they are doing things "wrong", won't it? and doesn't that turn markdown's genesis upside-down? heck, next thing you know we'll be telling them to r.t.f.m. i would prefer that implementers get more sophisticated about teasing out the user's intent in "ambiguous" cases. of course,