Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "_hi".
Did you mean:
__i
2013 May 29
1
[RFC 7/11] virtio_pci: new, capability-aware driver.
...; > > +{
> >> > > > + iowrite32((u32)val, (__le32 *)addr);
> >> > > > + iowrite32(val >> 32, (__le32 *)addr + 1);
> >> > > > +}
> >> > > > +
> >> > >
> >> > > Let's put addr_lo/addr_hi in the structure then,
> >> > > to make the fact this field is not atomic explicit?
> >> >
> >> > Good point, assuming I haven't missed something.
> >> >
> >> > Are 64-bit accesses actually unknown in PCI-land? Or is this a limit...
2013 May 28
2
[RFC 7/11] virtio_pci: new, capability-aware driver.
...c void iowrite64(u64 val, const __le64 *addr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + iowrite32((u32)val, (__le32 *)addr);
> > > > + iowrite32(val >> 32, (__le32 *)addr + 1);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Let's put addr_lo/addr_hi in the structure then,
> > > to make the fact this field is not atomic explicit?
> >
> > Good point, assuming I haven't missed something.
> >
> > Are 64-bit accesses actually unknown in PCI-land? Or is this a limited
> > availability thing?
> >
&...
2020 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit 9/9] tests/old-plugins: Add plugin from nbdkit 1.18.2.
...g_Fmz<H;=ZtbVVi>Zxn97t#JIhw^PF+Ek?}O2Pgxiin
zZuAK(F~LH>I0tPQ2T$~c-cm@&e8BSE0t8%LmA;#${q`5MSzi5w{s*uAT+bk{V=uBk
zQvOvU<)>=&6UKUBcCuUExX{?|sIhUV`35XyDc^nbE_drYS;_N|9jru}Z?`MPflt^?
z5#3L|0r^%elQ9zS!_uDTt@h!zbkd`L@;H4>0N)1i)#!Ua`nl`gt`SOGm$v+I`htL(
zI#_U8%|)`tZL3LM$nI4OXi(Rn!R-_hi+43{EbW2<sJf6k<Lj%D_8`aK4fh)#e@s*7
zm@xt@i*Xb1=(%e^ciq$F+Sc{yO9<6A*d*2ql%g!_1N-^`GhKhKwq@;L4F9R*1+DL9
zB^UC$HpM=_Z+1-AKio+((b&=FwHJ-sVMa$m>u2X{)vbq4wSMN%s`pk5h8xj^A5#|w
z!#*g~ej)Nf$28+6$RPH}?cWF6VB7`Z_5{@SY}mL@@u88P9jF+~$K&g$NX6hDbG`3I
zym<8&X_>RXUjKvzf9nzTw5Ugpq7J#*z6*...
2012 Jun 24
0
nouveau _BIOS method
...PRSB.PR
1040: 53 41 50 52 53 43 06 50 52 53 41 50 52 53 44 06 SAPRSC.PRSAPRSD.
1050: 50 52 53 41 50 52 53 45 06 50 52 53 41 50 52 53 PRSAPRSE.PRSAPRS
1060: 46 06 50 52 53 41 50 52 53 47 06 50 52 53 41 50 F.PRSAPRSG.PRSAP
1070: 52 53 48 5b 82 88 0c 02 50 43 49 30 08 5f 48 49 RSH[....PCI0._HI
1080: 44 0c 41 d0 0a 08 08 5f 43 49 44 0c 41 d0 0a 03 D.A...._CID.A...
1090: 08 5f 41 44 52 00 14 09 5e 42 4e 30 30 00 a4 00 ._ADR...^BN00...
10a0: 14 0b 5f 42 42 4e 00 a4 42 4e 30 30 08 5f 55 49 .._BBN..BN00._UI
10b0: 44 00 14 16 5f 50 52 54 00 a0 0a 50 49 43 4d a4 D..._PRT...PICM.
1...
2017 Jan 05
3
[PATCH net-next] net: make ndo_get_stats64 a void function
...struct ena_admin_basic_stats ena_stats;
int rc;
if (!test_bit(ENA_FLAG_DEV_UP, &adapter->flags))
- return NULL;
+ return;
rc = ena_com_get_dev_basic_stats(adapter->ena_dev, &ena_stats);
if (rc)
- return NULL;
+ return;
stats->tx_bytes = ((u64)ena_stats.tx_bytes_high << 32) |
ena_stats.tx_bytes_low;
@@ -2204,8 +2204,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *ena_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
stats->rx_errors = 0;
stats->tx_errors = 0;
-
- return stats;
}
static const struct net_device_ops ena_netdev_ops = {
diff --git a/drivers/ne...
2017 Jan 05
3
[PATCH net-next] net: make ndo_get_stats64 a void function
...struct ena_admin_basic_stats ena_stats;
int rc;
if (!test_bit(ENA_FLAG_DEV_UP, &adapter->flags))
- return NULL;
+ return;
rc = ena_com_get_dev_basic_stats(adapter->ena_dev, &ena_stats);
if (rc)
- return NULL;
+ return;
stats->tx_bytes = ((u64)ena_stats.tx_bytes_high << 32) |
ena_stats.tx_bytes_low;
@@ -2204,8 +2204,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *ena_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
stats->rx_errors = 0;
stats->tx_errors = 0;
-
- return stats;
}
static const struct net_device_ops ena_netdev_ops = {
diff --git a/drivers/ne...
2020 Mar 26
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] Create libnbdkit.so
This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203
test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons.
This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit
processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I
revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it