search for: _guarantee_

...same page as it is being submitted to disk, depending on the kernel version and the requirements of the underlying storage. Once the disk write has been finished, the writeback bit is cleared and the page can be modified again. In all cases, the writes to a single page are ordered, but there is no _guarantee_ about writes to different data blocks being ordered. The ext4 journal will in fact impose some order on data writes, by ensuring that the data from all writes associated with a transaction are flushed before the data for the next transaction. Since fsync() of any file commits the current transacti...

Greetings. I am Arul Selvan works for Novell. I am exploring the Ext4 architecture, more specifically i would like to understand the write ordering, basically the same blocks is modified more than once, how the write is ordered. Could you point me the doc or the specific source file to look. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...same page as it is being submitted to disk, depending on the kernel version and the requirements of the underlying storage. Once the disk write has been finished, the writeback bit is cleared and the page can be modified again. In all cases, the writes to a single page are ordered, but there is no _guarantee_ about writes to different data blocks being ordered. The ext4 journal will in fact impose some order on data writes, by ensuring that the data from all writes associated with a transaction are flushed before the data for the next transaction. Since fsync() of any file commits the current transacti...

Dear Sir / Madam, I am using R Programming Language Version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) for sometime in a 32 bit PC running Windows OS (Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit)). During the execution / interpretation of the R script, sometimes it is found that behavior of the program is not consistent with the program structure. For example, it has been seen that, even if a condition inside an IF

..._ARM_NEON_INTR) > +#include "arm/celt_neon_intr.c" > +#endif > + > +#if ((defined(OPUS_ARM_ASM) && defined(FIXED_POINT)) \ > + || defined(OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR)) > #include "arm/arm_celt_map.c" > #endif You should keep the #elif (the intent was to _guarantee_ that only one of x86_celt_map.c or arm_celt_map.c would be included). Instead, just move the #if defined(OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR) block inside that #elif (both in test_unit_mathops.c and test_unit_rotation.c).

...m/celt_neon_intr.c" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if ((defined(OPUS_ARM_ASM) && defined(FIXED_POINT)) \ > > + || defined(OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR)) > > #include "arm/arm_celt_map.c" > > #endif > > You should keep the #elif (the intent was to _guarantee_ that only one > of x86_celt_map.c or arm_celt_map.c would be included). Instead, just > move the #if defined(OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR) block inside that #elif (both > in test_unit_mathops.c and test_unit_rotation.c). Will do > _______________________________________________ > opus mailing...

...yer 3 streaming licenses indicates that the MPEG process does not lead to "cheap, clear, safe and simple licensing". I don't know what this license will be, what the terms will be, whether it will be imposed at all or whether it will be changed at whim in another year or two. Can you _guarantee_ that MPEG-4 licensing will be better ? Can anyone ? Regards Marshall Eubanks > > Amen, > > Philippe Gentric > Software Architect > PHILIPS DIGITAL NETWORKS > Broadcast & Internet Delivery Solutions > Lab...

Hi, Optimizes celt_pitch_xcorr for floating point. Changes from RFCv2: - Changes recommended by Timothy for celt_neon_intr.c everything except, left the unrolled loop still unrolled - configure.ac - use AC_LINK_IFELSE instead of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE - Moved compile flags into Makefile.am - OPUS_ARM_NEON_INR --> typo --> OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR Viswanath Puttagunta (1): armv7: