search for: _group_

...d to expand the membership of a custom system user depending on the availability of some group on the target system i.e. user { "logger": name => "logger", ensure => "present", groups => ["adm", "wheel", "this _group_ if it exists"], shell => "/bin/bash"; } The "this _group_ if it exists" entry only works, if the group was already create. I need to expand the list of groups depending on the availability of some groups like i.e. user { "logger": na...

...vironment: SLES 9, SP3; samba-3.0.20b-3.4 We use Posix ACLs for a more granular control of permissions on our shares. We also use "hide unreadable = yes" for one share (we'd prefer to use it for more but we can't due to this issue). With "hide unreadable = yes," if a _group_ ACL entry has the read permission to a file or folder, and a user is a member of the group, the file or folder is visible. However, if a _user_ ACL entry has the read permission to a file or folder, the file or folder is *still hidden* to the user. Is this a known issue, working as intended, or...

...; Not sure if I am missing the trees for the forrest but to me that page seems to support my conclusion. That if I want to use Group Policy features with Samba I _do need_ active directory. I could try to use the older NT4 style System Policies but that is not what I am after, I am after using the _Group_ Policy features that only come with using active directory? Or did I miss something? -- Urs Rau -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -------------- next part -------------- --------------------------...

please see the code below. foo2 fails to dispatch correctly, but foo does fine. i have tried 'cacheMetaData(1)' and a number of different variants of 'cacheGenericsMetaData', on the possibility there is a caching issue. but i still can't sort it out. also one general question: does it really matter what's in the body of the function definition in a

I have a data set that I display using barplot. I don't know what you call it, but when I look at it, it looks like this: > lsu (0,0.1] (0.1,0.2] (0.2,0.3] (0.3,0.4] (0.4,0.5] (0.5,0.6] A 0.052631579 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 B 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.001007049 0.003021148 0.000000000 0.000000000 E 0.200000000 0.000000000

...ct is constructed and > > that that > > constitutes "availability?" > > What do you mean by "available" ? You are using quotes :) "Available" as referenced by PassSupport.h: /// RegisterAnalysisGroup - Register a Pass as a member of an analysis /// _group_. Analysis groups are used to define an interface (which need not /// derive from Pass) that is required by passes to do their job. Analysis /// Groups differ from normal analyses because any available implementation of /// the group will be used if it is available. /// /// If no analysis imple...

On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:15 AM, David Greene wrote: > However, what happens when alias analysis information gets > invalidated? > Is Andersen's still "available" in the sense analysis groups use it? > > If not, it seems it would be tough to make sure Andersen's is always > used everywhere that AliasAnalysis is asked for because there are > passes > llvm

On Thursday 09 August 2007 19:21, Chris Lattner wrote: > Interesting question, I don't have an answer to this. To make things more > complicated, you can have multiple instances of an analysis group and may > want different things at different times: > > -basicaa -licm -something_that_invalidates_aa -andersaa -licm -whatever Some questions about that: How does this