Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_global_offset_table".
Did you mean:
_global_offset_table_
2013 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol
Hi,
What is a recommended way of handling (define, assign value)
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol? It looks like Hexagon and X86_64 targets
use different API to achieve the same result.
tia,
Simon
2013 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol
Its a DefinedAtom whose value is set by the Target Handlers.
On 10/21/2013 3:08 PM, Simon Atanasyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is a recommended way of handling (define, assign value)
> _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol? It looks like Hexagon and X86_64 targets
> use different API to achieve the same result.
>
> tia,
>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs....
2013 Oct 21
1
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol
...ine?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Shankar Easwaran
<shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Its a DefinedAtom whose value is set by the Target Handlers.
>
> On 10/21/2013 3:08 PM, Simon Atanasyan wrote:
>> What is a recommended way of handling (define, assign value)
>> _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol? It looks like Hexagon and X86_64 targets
>> use different API to achieve the same result.
--
Simon
2013 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 56
...e request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds
(Reid Kleckner)
4. Re: Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds
(Reid Kleckner)
5. Re: Bug #16941 (Dmitry Babokin)
6. Re: First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
(Arnold Schwaighofer)
7. [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol (Simon Atanasyan)
8. Re: [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol (Shankar Easwaran)
9. Re: First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction (Renato Golin)
10. Re: [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol (Simon Atanasyan)
11. Re: First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
...