Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "_gcc_next_limits_h".
2008 Aug 08
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
...mail.com> wrote:
> I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
> include path)
> error. Any idea what's happening here?
>
No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here)
Try adding:
#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
to limitx.h like so:
#ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
+#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
#include_next <limits.h>
#undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
and then testing. A good test would do a -dM -E and seeing if
everything is still defined and checking the testcase mentioned in the
original email thread.
2008 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
I think this error is due to these changes:
Doing diffs in .:
--- ./gsyslimits.h.~1~ 2006-11-26 12:31:50.000000000 -0800
+++ ./gsyslimits.h 2007-04-02 12:37:38.000000000 -0700
@@ -4,5 +4,3 @@
instead of this text. */
#define _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H /* tell gcc's limits.h to recurse */
-#include_next <limits.h>
-#undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
--- ./limitx.h.~1~ 2006-11-26 12:31:48.000000000 -0800
+++ ./limitx.h 2007-04-02 13:51:40.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
/* This administrivia gets added to the beginning of limits.h
if th...
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
> to limitx.h like so:
>
> #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
> +#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
> #include_next <limits.h>
> #undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
This fixes this problem for me on Ubuntu Hardy on x86-64.
John
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
...r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
>> include path)
>> error. Any idea what's happening here?
>>
> No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here)
>
> Try adding:
>
> #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
>
> to limitx.h like so:
>
> #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
> +#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
> #include_next <limits.h>
> #undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
>
> and then testing. A good test would do a -dM -E and seeing if
> everything is still defined and checking the testcase mentioned in the
> original email thread.
> _____________________...
2008 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble building llvm-gcc as of today, with and without
bootstrap.
The error I get is:
/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/./gcc/
-B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/../install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/../install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
2008 Aug 07
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
Hi Matthijs,
>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to
>> test out Mike's suggestion to see if it's a better way of doing it.
> I just tried building llvm-gcc without your hack, and it still works (even
> without the fix Mike suggested).
>
> So, it seems that r54245 can be reverted again?
>
> I didn't test bootstrap, however,
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
include path)
error. Any idea what's happening here?
Thanks,
-David Shipman
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthijs,
>
>>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to
>>> test out Mike's suggestion to see if
2008 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> I think this error is due to these changes:
Try adding:
#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
to limitx.h like so:
#ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
+#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
#include_next <limits.h>
#undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
and then testing. A good test would do a -dM -E and seeing if
everything is still defined and checking the testcase mentioned in the
original email thread.