search for: _for_

...)-2, replace = TRUE) ) paste(length(x),length(y)) # let's comapre times: # slow solution with loops, my function x_by_locallyMean_x_4_0s_in_y__loop() # system.time( # x_by_locallyMean_x_4_0s_in_y__loop<- # replace_x_by_locallyMean_x_4_0s_in_y.f(x,y) # ) # _for_ x<-1:(50*1000) # # user system elapsed # 760.34 0.86 769.16 #--------------------------------------------------------------- # time of Thierry's function : system.time( x_by_locallyMean_x_4_0s_in_y__Thierry<- replace_x_by_locallyMean_x_4_0s_in_...

On Mar 14, 2014 3:41 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > A few years ago, at popular request, I changed the default of the list > > to have a Reply-To: pointing at the list. I personally find it very > > annoying, and I would like to change the default back. > > > > Would people object to trying it? >

...ntial consequences. > > > > Regards, > > Ady. > > I too am curious at how this is annoying. I find it generally useful but > even with reply-to and the message on the bottom I find users/mailers still > emailing me directly rather than the list. FWIW: I'm voting _for_ this change. So do _not change_ the Reply-To: header. See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for motivation. That webpage is over a decade old, so it lacks that good e-mail programms have _three_ reply-buttons: "Reply", "Reply to all" and "Reply to List"....

oops, i forgot to reply to the list :-/ Début du message réexpédié : > De : Vincent Dautremont <vdautrem@ulb.ac.be> > Date : 30 août 2007 16:58:26 GMT+02:00 > À : Ali Jawad <alijawad1@gmail.com> > Objet : Rép : [LARTC] Priotirize SSH Traffic > > try that > #tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle1: prio > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32

R Users: My question is probably more about elementary statistics than the mechanics of using R, but I've been dabbling in R (version 2.2.0) and used it recently to test some data . I have a relatively small set of observations (n = 12) of arsenic concentrations in background groundwater and wanted to test my assumption of normality. I used the Shapiro-Wilk test (by calling shapiro.test()

Howdy. I feel like I am missing something really simply with regards to the way that Puppet works and I am wondering if someone can point me in the write direction. I have written a class that downloads, uncompresses, compiles, and installs Python from source. So far so good. The problem is that it only needs to do this once, when Python is not already in place (or some other custom

Dear all, I am trying to learn lapply. I would like, as a test case, to try the lapply alternative for the Shadowlist<-array(data=NA,dim=c(dimx,dimy,dimmaps)) for (i in c(1:dimx)){ Shadowlist[,,i]<-i } ---so I wrote the following--- returni <-function(i,ShadowMatrix) {ShadowMatrix<-i} lapply(seq(1:dimx),Shadowlist[,,seq(1:dimx)],returni) So far I do not get same results

AKA: MinGW + win32threads is holding LLVM (and all of its subprojects) back. We need to stop supporting this host platform. I'm aware of essentially 2 reasonably important use cases for supporting MinGW + win32threads: 1) Sane host toolchain on Windows that doesn't require downloading MSVC. (I'm dubious about the value of this one...) 2) Cross-compiling a Windows clang.exe (and

Hello, I believe that ZFS and it''s concepts is truly revolutionary to the point that I no longer see any OS as modern if it does not have comparable storage functionality. Therefore I think that file system/disk manager with similar qualities should be written for Linux. Does Sun have plans to dual license ZFS as GPL so it can be ported to native Linux? If not, is it legal to write

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448 Summary: rsync modifies files in place even without --inplace specified Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org