search for: _fixxfdi

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_fixxfdi".

2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
...-I. -I. -I../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc -I../../ llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/. -I../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/../include -I./../intl - I../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/Users/arnold/Desktop/ testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/llvm/include -I/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/ vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../build/include -m64 -DL_fixxfdi - fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS -c ../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/x86_64/_fixxfdi.o Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f80 ../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/libgcc2.c:1235: internal compiler error: Abort trap will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try again a...
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
..../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc -I../../ > llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/. -I../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/../include -I./../intl - > I../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/Users/arnold/Desktop/ > testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/llvm/include -I/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/ > vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../build/include -m64 -DL_fixxfdi - > fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS -c ../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/libgcc2.c > -o libgcc/x86_64/_fixxfdi.o > Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f80 > ../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/libgcc2.c:1235: internal compiler error: Abort > trap > > will disable multilib (./configure --disable-mu...
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both llvm and llvm-gcc. There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect code that doesn't use long double. On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Okay dokey, thanks :) > On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency
2007 Sep 19
4
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
Okay dokey, thanks :) On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a >> bug? > > I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.