search for: _fewer_

...o a function with this attribute cannot be moved to have additional control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A to B is only possible if B dominates or post-dominates A. 2) co-convergent (divergent? for lack of a better name...): a call to a function with this attribute cannot be moved to have _fewer_ control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A to B is only possible if A dominates or post-dominates B. 3) uniform (for function arguments): transformations are not allowed to introduce additional non-uniformity in this argument. I'd appreciate input on this proposal, e.g. if this can be so...

...ith this attribute cannot be moved to have additional control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A to B is only possible if B dominates or post-dominates A. >> >> 2) co-convergent (divergent? for lack of a better name...): a call to a function with this attribute cannot be moved to have _fewer_ control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A to B is only possible if A dominates or post-dominates B. >> >> 3) uniform (for function arguments): transformations are not allowed to introduce additional non-uniformity in this argument. > > Can you describe it in terms that are non-...

...intention to create incompatibility between the S4 generic and S3 code in this case, we should fix that. There are some cases in which the generic needs extra named arguments to allow sensible methods, for example "[". I can't think of any case where one would intentionally have _fewer_ arguments in the generic. > > > ......

...al control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A >>>> to B is only possible if B dominates or post-dominates A. >>>> >>>> 2) co-convergent (divergent? for lack of a better name...): a call to >>>> a function with this attribute cannot be moved to have _fewer_ >>>> control dependencies; i.e., moving it from A to B is only possible if >>>> A dominates or post-dominates B. >>>> >>>> 3) uniform (for function arguments): transformations are not allowed >>>> to introduce additional non-uniformity in...