search for: _feels_

This could be entirely my imagination, but it _feels_ like my apps are ever so slightly less responsive after deploying with Capistrano. Is that even possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060417/73f30cef/attachment.html

...ll not know to establish a new connection and will still > attempt to send packets on the old connection. In this case, they > should get a RST from the takeover node's TCP stack... so, this is > strange. Yes, we have a flat /16 network on team0 and man /24 subnets on team1. It _feels_ like the clients on the team1 network are affected more often but OTOH there are _much_ more clients in that network... > Are there any patterns for the clients that do not reconnect? Are > they all on certain subnets? Is it always the same clients? No, we could not find any pattern y...

...new connection and will still > > attempt to send packets on the old connection. In this case, they > > should get a RST from the takeover node's TCP stack... so, this is > > strange. > Yes, we have a flat /16 network on team0 and man /24 subnets on > team1. It _feels_ like the clients on the team1 network are affected > more often but OTOH there are _much_ more clients in that network... OK, let's keep that in mind. :-) > Speaking of the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_CTDB_for_Clustered_NFS states > "Never mount the same N...

Hi Uli, [Sorry for slow response, life is busy...] On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:06:26 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel > 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 > clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report > something like this: > [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22