search for: _fast_

Just tried Dovecot with 85k mails from Linux kernel mailing list, total of 357MB. I mostly wanted to see if the new binary tree file works well. And it does :) Nothing gets slowed down after deleting messages all around the mailbox. I tried several things with Dovecot, UW-IMAPd and Courier. You'll see that Dovecot is faster in everything else except raw I/O which is a bit strange, have to

...out a license file, you can't create more than two accounts or workspaces. Perforce is not the fanciest thing out there, but it's simple and it works well. My two yen, Duraid P.S. Perhaps a minor point in this era of 400GB hard disks and 2GHz CPUs, but worth mentioning: Perforce is _FAST_.

Hi, I guess I should open a bug in bugzilla. Some questions: I installed 1.1.10 and 1.1.11 through PlayOnLinux. Does this make a difference for the bug reporting? I have the output from the terminal (backtrace below). What could I do to provide more useful information? I suppose the next step would be to do a bisect but I've never done it and I suspect I'll need quite a bit of time.

...two accounts or workspaces. > > Perforce is not the fanciest thing out there, but it's simple and it > works well. > > My two yen, > > Duraid > > P.S. Perhaps a minor point in this era of 400GB hard disks and 2GHz > CPUs, but worth mentioning: Perforce is _FAST_. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively developing), please have a look at this site:

Everyone, We just had a pretty bad crash on one of production boxes and the ext2 filesystem on the data partition of our box had some major filesystem corruption. Needless to say, I am now looking into converting the filesystem to ext3 and I have some questions regarding ext3 and Linux software RAID. I have read that previously there were some issues running ext3 on a software raid device

Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find more detail on this debate? Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load on the computer is too high, or simply that it doesn't work well in a poorly designed

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface