search for: _false_

...sion 39474) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0] Rails 3.2.13 I have a validates ... :uniqueness constraint on one of the attributes of an ActiveRecord class. In my test suite, I set the attribute from the same attribute in a record in the fixture. I then send invalid? to the object under test. invalid? returns _false_, and the .errors object for the record shows no errors. A :uniqueness constraint on another attribute does invalidate the record. All validations on other attributes behave as expected. I''ve done what I could to search the Rails docs, Google, Stack Overflow, and this forum for similar pr...

...s, also. :) I was just working on some test cases; I'll post it soon. It's somewhat different than yours. I haven't touched the clang side yet, but I think it needs to be more complex than what you have there. I think it actually needs to be able to evaluate the intrinsic as a constant _false_ in the front-end in some circumstances, rather than always emitting IR if it cannot tell the answer is true. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:10 PM Bill Wendling via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello again! > > I took a stab at PR4898[1]. The attached patch improves Cl...

Hello again! I took a stab at PR4898[1]. The attached patch improves Clang's __builtin_constant_p support so that the Linux kernel is happy. With this improvement, Clang can determine if __builtin_constant_p is true or false after inlining. As an example: static __attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(int x) { if (__builtin_constant_p(x)) return 1; return 0; } static

> How's forever work for you? ;-> Absolutely FINE thank you! When your WizWonder package is housebroken, let me try it if I'm interested. Until then, a (stubbornly) broken distro will persuade me to try something else. That's why I left Windows, I guess, if you prognosticate correctly, it will be why I leave RedHat/CentOS. btw this has nothing to do with Firewalls at

Hello mailing list! I have been working with XCP a little bit, and I have the impression that this distro is insecure. First, it does not look like update repositories are enabled inside /etc/yum.repos.d, although I''m from an apt background so I may be misinterpreting that. Where will my security updates come from? Next, it appears that the root password hash is directly stored inside