search for: _existing_

Yea. I think AMD chains the node they're expanding into, but they don't chain it into an _existing_ chain. e.g. adding A->B to the DAG is ok. But adding A->B and next C->D with B->C is the problem. I appreciate the input On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:04 PM Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 16, 2020, at 17:00, Hendrik Greving <hgreving at go...

...he first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---2088752589-1867062326-990643072=:2129 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII 1) What are the issues with making _existing_ functions in base into generics? EG, I've recently become annoyed that plot() is a generic which can be applied to a formula: plot( outcome ~ predictor) but functions like points, lowess, etc are not generic or don't have methods defined for formulae. I've created a points.formula(...

...ciated with parent * Assigning an existing child after a parent''s creation saves the child record with the parent''s id. child = Child.new parent = Parent.new parent.children << child # Results in child being associated with parent ...however... * Assigning an _existing_ child during parent''s creation does not save the child''s record with the parent''s id. child = Child.create Parent.create(:children => [Child.new]) # Child is not associated with parent This seems slightly counter-intuitive; unless I am missing something obv...

...then renamed to the original filename. It looks to me that instead of - create new file intermediate file - delete original file by renaming new file it would be better if samba would do the following - create new file intermediate file - "cat" contents of the intermediate file on the _existing_ file This would imho allow to preserver the ownership and the ACLs. In order to establish understanding I repeat myself using pseudo shell commands. Current Samba behavior: - echo "data" > intermediate_file # user B is storing the file - mv intermediate_file original_file # user B...

...0 23:35 > *To:* Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Selection DAG chain question > > > > Yea. I think AMD chains the node they're expanding into, but they don't > chain it into an _existing_ chain. e.g. adding A->B to the DAG is ok. But > adding A->B and next C->D with B->C is the problem. I appreciate the input > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:04 PM Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 16, 2020, at 17:00, Hendri...

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:27AM +0800, John Garry wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > > Add a new field 'nr_reserved_cmds' to the SCSI host template to > instruct the block layer to set aside a tag space for reserved > commands. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 + >

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:27AM +0800, John Garry wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > > Add a new field 'nr_reserved_cmds' to the SCSI host template to > instruct the block layer to set aside a tag space for reserved > commands. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 + >

...om> >>> *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Selection DAG chain question >>> >>> >>> >>> Yea. I think AMD chains the node they're expanding into, but they don't >>> chain it into an _existing_ chain. e.g. adding A->B to the DAG is ok. But >>> adding A->B and next C->D with B->C is the problem. I appreciate the input >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:04 PM Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >&...

Hello, I surely did a mistake by configuring our zones with zfs-root: Patches are no longer possible (without disabling the zones in /etc/zones/index) in S10u3! My questions are: 1. Has S10u4 support for zone-root in zfs? 2. Will it be possible to patch my _existing_ zfs-rooted zones when such zones will be supported? 3. Sun itself seems to recommend zfs for zone-root for easy cloning of zones! I''m somewhat confused; Can someone give me a hint how I should/could update our servers to an actual patchlevel (OK, this is somewhat Solaris-specific, but...

Dear R experts. I saw in a lot of examples the following R code: x11() op <- par(no.readonly = TRUE) par(op) Warning message: calling par(new=) with no plot Why I get a warning? I'm doing something wrong? Thank you! -- WBR, Timur

If I use : rsync --delete -va dump/* remote::home to mirror a local directory containing several files to a remote server then these are copied as expected. However, if I delete a file in 'dump' and do the command again then this file in 'remote' is NOT deleted. But this works: rsync --delete -va dump/ remote::home ie, the file on the server is deleted. Is this a bug or are

...me the whole queue depth > isn't increased, that means the tags for IO request is decreased given > reserved tags can't be used for IO, so IO performance may be effected. > > If not the case, please explain a bit in commit log. > The overall idea of this patchset is to fold _existing_ management command handling into using the blk-mq bitmap. Currently, quite a lot of drivers are using management commands internally, which typically use the same hardware tag pool (ie they are being allocated from the same hardware resources) than the 'normal' I/O commands. But as they are...

> No, non-sideeffecting operations can be legalized as compiler-rt calls Right, but not as "regular" nodes with side-effects? I guess you could search and analyze the DAG manually but that seems hacky. Maybe something that one day LLVM could support natively. On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:55 AM Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 16, 2020, at

Hi all, I am trying to create a list of all variable/value combinations in environment(). When a function with unset arguments is called, the method I have been using fails with a "missing argument" error. However it should be possible to simply skip these missing objects in the generation of the list? Could anyone recommend me a better way (that does not use a slow

This morning I tried to see if I could find the r-help mailing list on Google Groups, which has an interface that I like. I found three Google Groups ("The R Project for Statistical Computing", "rproject", and "rhelp") but none of them are connected to the r-help list. Is there perhaps some reason why it wouldn't be a good thing for there to be a connected

I really think this is a Windows problem, but since my very good friend Bill refuses to return my calls ... The client is WinXP Professional The server is RedHat 7.1 with SAMBA 2.2.2-8 I have rtfm several times both the ENCRYPTION and PDC-Howto, and I think I have implemented all of the requisite registry and passwd/smbpasswd/smb.conf settings. The client will happily JOIN the domain, but my

...to see where the bottlenecks really are, and try to improve those parts. - If no significant improvement is possible in R, move only the time-consuming part of the computation to C/Fortran/C++. The above mode is not always followed, because many of the packages on CRAN are simply R interfaces to _existing_ C/Fortran code. One would be happy to be able to use them at the R level, but to rewrite the whole thing in R, one better have _very_ good reason! For some algorithms, efficient code can be written in pure R, but the resulting code can be less readable than one written more legibly in C for Fortr...

I'm trying to understand why vendors keep making 100Mbps integrated 1-port switches in their hardware SIP phones. Even the recently-announced D40 and D50 Digium phones are limited to 100Mbps. Only the more expensive models (like the D70) can run at 1000Mbps. However, you can't expect a firm with hundreds of extensions to buy the most expensive model... And gigabit speed is important when

...There's ALREADY a multiplexor in the operating system and browser of > all of today's systems. They use MIME types. If you have a sub-multiplexor > to figure out Ogg types, that's a great reason to ignore Ogg - it's > "just too complicated." Let users use their _existing_ setup where they can. > There's no reason to create a dual-level multiplexor just to hear > an audio clip in the most common Ogg audio or video format. As you say below, MIME types have an inherent limitation, so the OS/browser multiplexor is clearly insufficient. > > For special...

...There's ALREADY a multiplexor in the operating system and browser of > all of today's systems. They use MIME types. If you have a sub-multiplexor > to figure out Ogg types, that's a great reason to ignore Ogg - it's > "just too complicated." Let users use their _existing_ setup where they can. > There's no reason to create a dual-level multiplexor just to hear > an audio clip in the most common Ogg audio or video format. As you say below, MIME types have an inherent limitation, so the OS/browser multiplexor is clearly insufficient. > > For special...