search for: _effective_

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_effective_".

Did you mean: _effective
2005 May 29
0
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
...the whole world said Red Hat was "getting out of the desktop market." In reality, I totally agree that it's really not of any interest to Red Hat to keep trying to _sell_ a _product_ that is geared towards all the endless uses of a consumer/custom desktop. It's _cheaper_ and more _effective_ for Red Hat to put people on developing and giving away a distro like Fedora Core. It was a basic admission that Red Hat Linux as a "product" was attempting to please way too many people, and was failing to do so. If you don't like what you see in RHEL/CentOS as standard, your best...
2008 Nov 08
0
A broader CentOS information sharing issue? [ Was What's an Enterprise class OS ]
...can of worms, when considered in the light of things such as what you mention and the assumption that the user base is growing. I thought it might be useful to the project to think about this. If not, just ignore this please. In projects I've seen in the past, the addressing of things such as _effective_ FAQs, proper indoctrination of new users (in ML, fora and chat rooms) into the _basics_ of the project are usually delayed until the swelling volume forces action to be taken just for sanity/survival of the "hittest". :-) Although these things weren't ignored, they are often considere...
2015 Nov 07
3
Heads up on syslinux breakage in Ubuntu
On 07/11/15 19:38, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> >> Just a heads up that syslinux is broken in the current Ubuntu, syslinux >> just shows "Boot error". Downgrading to syslinux from 15.04 works perfectly. >> >> Ubuntu bug is here: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1499746 >> >> This is mostly in case anyone
2004 Jun 18
21
patch: HTB update for ADSL users
OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with