Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_eerily_".
2005 Jan 09
0
[LLVMdev] Version Control Upgrade?
...mewar and so won't mention other VCSs that could be
contrasted here, but the differences are certainly there. Getting up and
running
- Perforce is _very_ well documented.
- Perforce is _very_ well supported: should anyone ever need help,
Perforce support is incredibly helpful, polite and _eerily_ rapid to
respond. At this point I should mention that the VCS comparison says
that no support is available for people using Perforce with a free
open-source license. This is indeed "the letter of the law", but the
reality is that Perforce support tries to help everyone on a best-effor...
2005 Jan 10
4
[LLVMdev] Version Control Upgrade?
...Ss that
> could be contrasted here, but the differences are certainly there.
> Getting up and running
>
> - Perforce is _very_ well documented.
>
> - Perforce is _very_ well supported: should anyone ever need help,
> Perforce support is incredibly helpful, polite and _eerily_ rapid to
> respond. At this point I should mention that the VCS comparison says
> that no support is available for people using Perforce with a free
> open-source license. This is indeed "the letter of the law", but the
> reality is that Perforce support tries to help ever...
2005 Jan 08
10
[LLVMdev] Version Control Upgrade?
LLVMers,
The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better
version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure
what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions.
If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively
developing), please have a look at this site: