search for: _dl_new_object

...tion (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so) ==3135== by 0x53755ED: __nss_next2 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so) ==3135== ==3135== 23 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 9 ==3135== at 0x4C29BFD: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==3135== by 0x400B223: _dl_new_object (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so) ==3135== by 0x40060EB: _dl_map_object_from_fd (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so) ==3135== by 0x400849A: _dl_map_object (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so) ==3135== by 0x4013843: dl_open_worker (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so) ==3135== by 0x400F1B3: _dl_catch_error (in /usr/lib64/ld-...

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741 Summary: ULOGD segfaults on init Product: ulogd Version: SVN (please provide timestamp) Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: ulogd_MYSQL AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

WINS nsswitch module -------------------- The WINS nsswitch module has been rewritten to address memory issues and to simplify the code. The module now uses libwbclient to do WINS queries. This means that winbind needs to be running in order to resolve WINS names using the nss_wins module. This does not affect smbd. my problem: old versions >> ping google.com >> PING google.com

...init 1 generic_start_main _dl_discover_osversion 1 __libc_init_first __libc_init_secure 1 __libc_init_first _dl_non_dynamic_init 1 generic_start_main _dl_aux_init 1 _dl_init_paths _dl_important_hwcaps 1 _dl_non_dynamic_init _dl_get_origin 1 _dl_non_dynamic_init _dl_setup_hash 1 _dl_non_dynamic_init _dl_new_object 1 _dl_non_dynamic_init _dl_add_to_namespace_list 1 _dl_non_dynamic_init _dl_init_paths 1 __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal _dl_get_tls_static_info 1 generic_start_main _dl_debug_initialize 1 __libc_pthread_init __register_atfork 1 __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal __libc_pthread_init 1 __li...

A rebased version of the lld patch is attached. Cheers, Rafael On 31 July 2017 at 15:11, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Tobias Edler von Koch <tobias at codeaurora.org> writes: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 07/31/2017 04:20 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev wrote: >>> However, do we need to start with

...s.cpp:297) ==10132== by 0x83D0920: main (opt.cpp:87) ==10132== ==10132== ==10132== 155 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 16 of 33 ==10132== at 0x401C451: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) ==10132== by 0x401D7A6: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:306) ==10132== by 0x4008D21: _dl_new_object (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so ) ==10132== by 0x400542D: _dl_map_object_from_fd (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so) ==10132== by 0x4007050: _dl_map_object (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so) ==10132== by 0x422C23D: dl_open_worker (in /lib/tls/libc.so.6) ==10132== by 0x400D185: _dl_catch_error (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so) ==10132==...