Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_dispose".
Did you mean:
dispose
2008 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] new LTO C interface
...s llvm independent. It may even
migrate out of include/llvm-c at some point.
> 2. Do we need those #include's?
We need stddef.h for size_t and stdbool.h for bool.
> 4. lto_codegen_release -> lto_codegen_release_memory to be clearer
> and more consistent.
Renamed to lto_codegen_dispose()
> 5. Use C comments /* ... */?
Fixed.
> 6. Please start comments with capital letters and end sentences
> with periods! Or perhaps not since it'll drive Chris nuts. :-)
Fixed.
On Feb 24, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>> #include <stdint.h>
>> #inc...
2008 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] new LTO C interface
Hi Nick,
I don't have any comments on the substance of the APIs (I'm not expert
in this area), just some style notes. Overall, the capitalization
style is inconsistent with the bulk of the C bindings, which are more
Carbon than GNU.
On Feb 23, 2008, at 01:34, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
Note that MSVC++ still doesn't
2008 Feb 23
5
[LLVMdev] new LTO C interface
Hello. I work at Apple on our linker. We are working to improve
support for llvm
in our tools. A while back Devang created <llvm/LinkTimeOptimizer.h>
a C++
interface which allows the linker to process llvm bitcode files along
with native
mach-o object files.
For the next step we'd like our other tools like nm, ar, and lipo to
be able to
transparently process bitcode files
2013 Mar 25
86
[PATCH 00/28] libxl: ocaml: improve the bindings
The following series of patches fill in most of the gaps in the OCaml bindings
to libxl, to make them useful for clients such as xapi/xenopsd (from XCP).
There are a number of bugfixes to the existing bindings as well. I have an
experimental version of xenopsd that successfully uses the new bindings.
An earlier version of the first half of the series was submitted to the last
by Ian Campbell on