search for: _displayed_

I would like to assign a variable y the string: <question><span style="color: #0000FF; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt"> How can I do it - is it possible? Best, Robert

I am trying to find the actual _displayed_ position of a floated element using Javascript. Does anyone know of a technique to do this? I know that per the CSS2 spec, floated elements are removed from the flow and thus don''t really have a position (AFAIK). However, I am trying to find the position in which the item is actuall...

Hello, ** Please CC replies to ian@ichilton.co.uk as I am not subscribed ** I have a Brother laser printer connected to a linux box running Samba. It is working fine from Win98 workstations, but now I have Win2K on my laptop, I am unable to print. This is because the linux box obviously doesn't have the win2k driver so I tried to install it as a local printer and then change it to a network

...80347, ??? ##???? ... ??? ## 2: do.call(paste0, list(abs, x)) ??? ## 1: system.time(do.call(paste0, list(abs, x))) ??? ##??? user? system elapsed ??? ##?? 0.000?? 0.000?? 0.003 More generally, it might be better to have a different smaller default value for the lines to deparse when calls? are _displayed_ as parts of lists, as is the case with `traceback()`, or in `print(sys.calls())` and similar. I attach a patch that does this.? I have run some basic tests and `make check-devel` passes. I can file an issue on bugzilla if that is a better place to have this conversation (assuming there is inte...

...: do.call(paste0, list(abs, x)) > ??? ## 1: system.time(do.call(paste0, list(abs, x))) > ??? ##??? user? system elapsed > ??? ##?? 0.000?? 0.000?? 0.003 > > > More generally, it might be better to have a different smaller default > value for the lines to deparse when calls? are _displayed_ as parts of > lists, as is the case with `traceback()`, or in `print(sys.calls())` and > similar. > > I attach a patch that does this.? I have run some basic tests > and `make check-devel` passes. I can file an issue on bugzilla > if that is a better place to have this conversatio...

...tem.time(do.call(paste0, list(abs, x))) >>> ## user system elapsed >>> ## 0.000 0.000 0.003 >>> >>> >>> More generally, it might be better to have a different smaller default >>> value for the lines to deparse when calls are _displayed_ as parts of >>> lists, as is the case with `traceback()`, or in `print(sys.calls())` and >>> similar. >>> >>> I attach a patch that does this. I have run some basic tests >>> and `make check-devel` passes. I can file an issue on bugzilla >>> i...

...: do.call(paste0, list(abs, x)) > ??? ## 1: system.time(do.call(paste0, list(abs, x))) > ??? ##??? user? system elapsed > ??? ##?? 0.000?? 0.000?? 0.003 > > > More generally, it might be better to have a different smaller default > value for the lines to deparse when calls? are _displayed_ as parts of > lists, as is the case with `traceback()`, or in `print(sys.calls())` and > similar. > > I attach a patch that does this.? I have run some basic tests > and `make check-devel` passes. I can file an issue on bugzilla > if that is a better place to have this conversatio...

...x)) >> ??? ## 1: system.time(do.call(paste0, list(abs, x))) >> ??? ##??? user? system elapsed >> ??? ##?? 0.000?? 0.000?? 0.003 >> >> >> More generally, it might be better to have a different smaller default >> value for the lines to deparse when calls? are _displayed_ as parts of >> lists, as is the case with `traceback()`, or in `print(sys.calls())` and >> similar. >> >> I attach a patch that does this.? I have run some basic tests >> and `make check-devel` passes. I can file an issue on bugzilla >> if that is a better place...