Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "_cs".
Did you mean:
_ch
2013 Apr 25
1
Looping through names of both dataframes and column-names
...(1,5)for (i in nl) {
assign(paste0("df_",nl[i]),data.frame(x=seq(1:10),y=rnorm(10)))}
ls()[grep("df_",ls())]
nls<-ls()[grep("df_",ls())]for (df in nls) {
print(df)
for (var in names(get(df))) {
print(var)
assign(paste0(df,"$",paste0(var,"_cs")),cumsum(get(df)[[var]]))
}}
ls()[grep("df_",ls())]
The code above *almost* works, except that it creates a whole bunch of
objects of the form df_1$x_cs,df_1$yx_cs ..... What I want is 5 dataframes,
with the $ elements enclosed, as usual.
Any help or guidance would be appreciate...
2020 Jul 18
25
[PATCH 00/12] Bunch of patches for cross-compilatio + RP4
...numa.h | 5 ---
xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h | 2 +
10 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2016 Jan 14
6
Bug#810964: only partial EDAC information with Xen
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64
Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u3
Debian 8.2 installed on a supermicro H8SGL Board, AMD 6128 with 4x4GB
ECC RAM.
When booting the plain kernel (stock Jessie 3.16 or backport 4.1 or
4.3), both memory controllers (mc0 and mc1) appear under
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc with two csrow* each as expected. Same
happens, when booted with Xen 4.1.4-3+deb7u1.
When booted with Xen
2023 Mar 07
2
Bug#1032480: xen: Important cherry-picks for bookworm/updates
...kly to get noticed as urgent.
Now to continuing the work on figuring out the consequences from
upgrading hardware a bit too early...
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2021 May 13
9
Bug#988477: xen-hypervisor-4.14-amd64: xen dmesg shows (XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT on sata pci device
Package: src:xen
Version: 4.14.1+11-gb0b734a8b3-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
X-Debbugs-Cc: debianbts at virtualzone.hu
Dear Maintainer,
after a clean install of bullseye/testing the xen dmesg shows the following message:
(XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT: 0000:01:00.1 d0 addr fffffffdf8000000 flags 0x8 I
this is the sata device:
01:00.1 SATA controller: Advanced Micro
2020 Sep 22
2
[PATCH] debian/scripts: Optimize scripts
...elif [ -z "$type" ]; then
error "Can't read hypervisor type from sysfs!"
else
--
2.20.1
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2017 May 13
2
Bug#810964: [Xen-devel] [BUG] EDAC infomation partially missing
...2 (POLLED)
I have not tried force-enabling ECC checking. Since I place high value
on my data, I rate this as a rather important bug.
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | EHeM+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2017 May 16
3
Bug#810964: [Xen-devel] [BUG] EDAC infomation partially missing
...I think this should be a fairly high priority for Xen since ECC memory is
a feature very common on systems running with a hypervisor.
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | EHeM+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2020 Sep 17
3
[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""):
> This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7.
Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005.
However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now
false that
| # These don't cross-compile
?
Should this patch go upstream ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson
2024 Jan 18
1
Bug#988477: Also observing #988477
...kernel bug.
So far no crashes/confirmed data loss have occured, but sweeping the
mirror does turn up small numbers of inconsistencies.
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2007 Nov 24
13
Bug#452721: xen-utils-common: "xendomains" does not restore domains in same order as it would start them
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 3.0.3-0-2
Severity: wishlist
The "xendomains" init script will start domains according to the order
of config files found in /etc/xen/auto/*. I use this so that, in the
event of a hard reboot, the more important domains will start first.
Some of these contain essential services like DNS resolvers, slapd and
so on, and since starting xen domains
2024 Sep 03
1
Bug#988477: xen-hypervisor-4.14-amd64: xen dmesg shows (XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT on sata pci device
...14
would be valuable knowledge if you have it. I had been using an older
processor with 4.14, so I hadn't observed it until 4.17.
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg at m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
2019 Feb 02
5
Bug#921187: Getting rid of rdepends on libxenmisc4.X so we can do backports
Package: src:xen
Version: 4.11.1-1
Currently, these are rdepends:
-$ apt-cache rdepends libxenmisc4.11
libxenmisc4.11
Reverse Depends:
libxen-dev
xen-utils-4.11
collectd
qemu-system-x86
libvirt-daemon
collectd-core
It's on the wishlist to start doing buster-backports for Xen.
If the user has a cluster of servers and can make use of live migrate,
then this allows the user to
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking