search for: _correctly_

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "_correctly_".

Did you mean: correctly_
2016 Jan 25
1
Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics
> i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 Adding this to the boot - does not make it work on straight 7.2 I saw information about this - but it is mentioned on the page I included that this was no longer needed with the files listed in the link. The kernel 4.4 installs and runs fine on the NUC5C. Its the xorg-server package that is is my issue. Everything else ran fine. The problem I'm trying
2023 Mar 13
1
[PATCH v2 0/2] [RFC] virtio-rng entropy leak reporting feature
...you chime in from the crypto/rng perspective if this looks sane? Jason has previously NACKed the patch without follow-up, and I don't want the patch to linger without a path to merging, especially when it's not clear what Jason meant. > However, the new spec does allow us to do things _correctly_, i.e. not rely on asynchronous handling of events to re-seed the kernel. For example, we > could achieve something like that by making use of the "copy-on-leak" operation, so that a flag changes value before vCPUs get resumed, so we know > when a leak has happened when needed, e.g....
2016 Aug 17
5
code to sort otherwise-unsortable "ilist"s, e.g. symbol tables
Dear all, The below has been tested quite thoroughly by now, including performance-testing by the way of using a modified compiler that triggers the below while compiling at least an old part of LLVM ["Function.cpp"] and sorting a symbol table with >7000 global variables. Unfortunately, the optimization I have been working on for which I _thought_ I needed the ability to sort a
2008 Sep 08
13
list corner case
I'm curious how people think the following *should* be interpreted: - one 2. two http://babelmark.bobtfish.net/?markdown=-++one%0D%0A2.+two%0D%0A%0D%0A As you can see, implementations split into three groups here: (a) treat as an unordered list Markdown.pl, Python markdown, MultiMarkdown, BlueCloth, MarkdownJ, Showdown (b) treat as an unordered list with an ordered
2015 Dec 19
2
For integer vectors, `as(x, "numeric")` has no effect.
As I tried to say on Dec. 11, there are two levels of "fix": 1. The fix to the complaint in the OP's subject heading is to conform to the default third argument, strict=TRUE: as(1L, "numeric") == 1.0 This generates some incompatibilities, as for classes that extend "numeric". But still leaves class(1.0) "numeric" and typeof(1.0) "double".