search for: _consistent_

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:28:14 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > > Yes, because > 1.) It might be necessary _locally_ on the Windows DC > because some _local_ services (e. g. Virus scanners, > etc) may access the files _locally_ _on the DC itself_. > However if anything on the client (the OS or a user) > would access the share

Hi all; I have two asterisk boxes installed in two separated sites, the internet bandwidth between them is very good and I am using G729 codec to communicate with them and IAX. The problem that side A hears well side B while side B does not hear well side A !! I did one thing in side B that in iax.conf, I set the bandwidth=high and it helped, but still side B is complaining from the quality

...lieve it works for you without SYSTEM, but I thought that the Samba > AD DC was supposed to be compatible with a Windows DC and as such, it > should be set up in the same way. That's why it is part of the Sysvol share's file system ACLs. To be consistent. However, this is only to be _consistent_. It has nothing to do with being _compatible in this case. Regards, Marc

...ars you don't have any ACLs set there, just Unix permissions, I have: ls -lad /home/SAMDOM/profiles/ drwxrwx--T+ 2 root root 4096 Nov 28 12:12 /home/SAMDOM/profiles/ > That's why it is part of the Sysvol share's file system ACLs. To be > consistent. However, this is only to be _consistent_. It has nothing > to do with being _compatible in this case. Not going to argue over a word, but we should be consistent about being consistent ;-) Rowland

What cost do you see here? Rui has done a significant amount of work to make this effectively zero cost. The improvements are meaningful, and (as was discussed on the other threads) pretty much every large scale change in the LLVM world has been shot down with objections like “it is too much churn”. This is a huge problem, because it leads to stagnation in the codebase and does not allow

I'm running an ANOVA on some data for respiration in a forest. I am having a problem with my degrees of freedom. For one of my variables I get one fewer degrees of freedom than I should. I have 12 plots and I therefore expected 11 degrees of freedom, but instead I got 10. Any ideas? I have some code and output below: > class(Combined.Plot) [1] "character" >