search for: _common

Is it possible to use a child model''s controller to impliment it''s parents view before adding its own output ? possibly by the use of super ? _tony -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...e is unknown 2014-01-31 13:48:45,587 - ERROR - Problem creating the VM: An error occurred, but the cause is unknown 2014-01-31 13:48:45,587 - ERROR - An error occurred, but the cause is unknown Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/nimbus/src/python/workspacecontrol/defaults/lvrt/lvrt_common.py", line 123, in create newvm = self._vmm().createXML(xml, 0) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libvirt.py", line 2189, in createXML if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateXML() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: An error occurred, but the cause is u...

...directs to the partial displaying the latest post made with the image that is uploaded if any.. I once again can then like in a loop post new image+message and redirect to this after getting it saved in my create method. To best explain this , I would like to add the code for my create method, the _common.html.erb parital that I am rendering and finally the create.js.erb which I want to get working for me.. provided I am able to fix my current issues.. **create method:-** def create @post = Post.new(params[:post]) respond_to do |format| if @post.message...

Hi. I prefer using the syslinux boot loader and recently undertook a project of creating a multiboot USB drive that boots using syslinux. The aim is to create a medium from which various live linux environments can be run for things like system maintenance, installation, and perhaps demonstration. I anticipate using this multiboot USB drive on mostly legacy, BIOS systems, if that matters. As

...t; identification to Syslinux's binaries (including for distros, with patches), I am not going to consider the matter really solved (other might not care, or might be pleased with less than that). I should know it, as I am the one actually encountering this type of problems while testing as _common user_ and helping solve the mismatch version problems. As I mentioned before, I have seen / read / helped users with mismatch version problems countless times already, for years now. Please, improve the versioning identification (not just for official upstream (pre-)prelease). Thank you for f...

On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote: > I could also say something about the ISOHybrid _HACK_, which clearly is not > something that was ever intended by the people who designed ISO-9660, and > that could "either work if you're lucky or fail if you're not". Looking at > the recent history of this mailing list, it does seem to me like ISOHybrid >

..."misunderstanding" (to put it gently) the matter in question. (Yes, I am intentionally repeating here this paragraph I already wrote in a prior email.) IMO, expanding the ISOLINUX and Isohybrid wiki pages "too-much" would not really answer many more practical questions for _common users_. At some point, it could give the impression of "too much for me to read / care", which would be even worse than the generic information that is currently provided. I have either read or tested many different methods of building ISO images and "how to write to USB" i...

"Google: Evil or Not?" is my first Rails webapp and I''ve just made it public at http://evilornot.info Do you still believe the ?Do no evil? Google mantra? Do you think Google Book Search, the AOL deal, and Larry and Sergey?s 767 point to Google losing it?s pristine morality and turning over to the dark side? Now you can discover what the world thinks and contribute your

On 22/03/2016 16:35, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: ... > How can we augment > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=ISOLINUX > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Isohybrid > so that users do not believe to have missed the trick for UEFI booting > from optical media ? +1. I have read Ady's answer to this message, but still: why not just state clearly in

I am completely baffled by this one - My guess is that there is no pure ruby way to do this - but how could I set up a spec to test that one method is an alias of another? Thanks for any help, Scott

We''re testing out the Puppetlabs-Firewall module. And it seems I''m either missing something fundamental or Logging/Accpet works/doesn''t work in an irregular way. I would be most grateful for some input. *COMMON:* firewall { ''002 accept related established rules INPUT'': proto => ''all'', state =>