search for: _combinations_

...st to use based on that and the "message" you have. So you're suggesting, I can either write into the stream: - nind[0][0..nb_subvect], or - nind[1][0..nb_subvect], or - nind[2][0..nb_subvect], or - ... Or do I have to do a little more hacking in the search function to get the N best _combinations_ of CB IDs? Wouldn't it be easier and just as effective (for N==2) to do the following: Get nb_subvect indeces to write into the stream. Write all but the last of these into the stream. If nind[0][nb_subvect-1] and nind[1][nb_subvect-1] have different LSBs and if the difference between ndist[0]...

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> 1. What is the point in multiplying a codebook index with some number >> ant adding a loop variable to it as done in the exc unquant function. >> for (j=0;j<subvect_size;j++) >> exc[subvect_size*i+j]+=s*0.03125*shape_cb[ind[i]*subvect_size+j]; > > That's just how you represent a 2D array in C: the codebook has

...st to use based on that and the "message" you have. So you're suggesting, I can either write into the stream: - nind[0][0..nb_subvect], or - nind[1][0..nb_subvect], or - nind[2][0..nb_subvect], or - ... Or do I have to do a little more hacking in the search function to get the N best _combinations_ of CB IDs? Wouldn't it be easier and just as effective (for N==2) to do the following: Get nb_subvect indeces to write into the stream. Write all but the last of these into the stream. If nind[0][nb_subvect-1] and nind[1][nb_subvect-1] have different LSBs and if the difference between ndist[0]...