search for: _class

Was my question not understood? Hello, I would like to connect 2 asterisk boxes together, so this is my scenario: Asterisk Main: it is connected to many sip providers and its main purpose as a call termination forwarder. Asterisk B: it?s connected to E1, and its purpose to terminate calls. It will receive SIP messages from Asterisk_Main, but there will be no voice traffic

Hi, We have SPA921 handsets which apparently support Paging, however i can't find any information on configuring Asterisk to make a page call. Does anyone have any information on Paging? Many thanks Dan Journo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > As long as you do not intend to use any classes, how about > simply adding > > -Dclass=_class > > to your command line? That kind of misses the point;-). It's not reasonable to expect all userspace C++ users to do this. David

Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the compiler being used supports C++). All but the final patch perform fixups, including: (1) Fix member names that conflict with C++ reserved words by providing alternates that can be used anywhere. An anonymous union is used so that that

Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the compiler being used supports C++). All but the final patch perform fixups, including: (1) Fix member names that conflict with C++ reserved words by providing alternates that can be used anywhere. An anonymous union is used so that that

Is there any easy way to identify which script or service is connecting to the Asterisk manager? Somewhere on my system a script or service is trying to connect with a bad user name or password. I get the following error: connect attempt from '127.0.0.1' unable to authenticate I thought maybe I could do a tcpdump on port 5038 and try to fish out the bad username or password but I

Here's a set of patches that inserts a step into the build process to make sure that the UAPI headers can all be built together with C++ (if the compiler being used supports C++). Note that it's based on a commit from the sound tree to fix usage of u32 and co.. Most of the patches perform fixups, including: (1) Fix member names that conflict with C++ reserved words by providing

Hi all, This patch series attempts to come closer to unifying kvm and lguest's usage of virtio. As these two are the first implementations we've seen, I hope making them closer will make future ones closer too. Drivers now unpack their own configuration: their probe() methods are uniform. The configuration mechanism is extensible and can be backed by PCI, a string of bytes, or

Hi all, This patch series attempts to come closer to unifying kvm and lguest's usage of virtio. As these two are the first implementations we've seen, I hope making them closer will make future ones closer too. Drivers now unpack their own configuration: their probe() methods are uniform. The configuration mechanism is extensible and can be backed by PCI, a string of bytes, or

...a3224c1..967142bc0e05 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h @@ -150,7 +150,12 @@ struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf { * command goes in between. */ struct virtio_net_ctrl_hdr { - __u8 class; + union { +#ifndef __cplusplus + __u8 class; +#endif + __u8 _class; + }; __u8 cmd; } __attribute__((packed));

...a3224c1..967142bc0e05 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h @@ -150,7 +150,12 @@ struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf { * command goes in between. */ struct virtio_net_ctrl_hdr { - __u8 class; + union { +#ifndef __cplusplus + __u8 class; +#endif + __u8 _class; + }; __u8 cmd; } __attribute__((packed));

Hi folks. I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple require ''mocha'' would set me up. Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious. Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up

...of the rules doesn't mean you can't just read the words of the standard. You don't have to guess. The standard is meant to be fairly accessible: Every byte has a unique address. 1 The fundamental storage unit in the C++ memory model is the byte. 5 Unless it is a bit-field (_class.bit_), a most derived object shall have a non-zero size and shall occupy one or more bytes of storage. So, let me state is this way, the address _must_ be different. If you can't tell they are not, you are free to have them be the same.

On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can >> understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining >> whether >> this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. >> Hopefully >> a language lawyer can chime in and say whether this transform is >>

On 15.10.2008, at 16.43, Duncan Sands wrote: >> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not >> the value. > > Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can > understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether > this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. > Hopefully > a language

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Tim <tim at tcsac.net> wrote: > Perfect. Which means good ol'' supermicro would come through :) WOHOO! > > AOC-USAS-L8i > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS-L8i.cfm Is this card new? I''m not finding it at the usual places like Newegg, etc. It looks like the LSI SAS3081E-R, but probably at 1/2 the