search for: _can

I own an Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+. I enabled SVM extensions on BIOS. I did a power cycle. xm dmesg shows me: (XEN) AMD SVM: ASIDs enabled (XEN) HVM: SVM enabled I run a 64 bit Xen kernel (OpenSuse 11). Xen version is 3.2.1_16881_04-8.6 I _can not_ run any x86_64 O.S on a HVM domU, because it appears something like this: "your cpu does not support long mode. use a 32bit distribution." Using 32 bit distros, it works but I would like to use 64 bit O.Ses. Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users...

Can I use the table name "adm_users" (mysql)? Will that give the model name "adm_user"? Or should it be "admusers" and "admuser"? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...url_for()) doesn''t work, as it doesn''t seem to recognize the current controller/action (this may be related to #0). If I don''t specify a controller and an action in my link_to(), I get: No url can be generated for the hash {:page=>"2"} In this case, I _can''t_ specify a controller (or action), as this code is in a partial to generate pager links, and is used by multiple controllers/views. Any ideas? Am I doing something wrong? Thanks ... -- Steve

...indices alias_. Consider the parameter > > values: > > > > ``` > > n = m = 3 > > x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 > > x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 > > ``` > > > > Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and > > so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. > > I'm unsure your example actually showcases the problem: > > C standard, N1570 draft, Page 560, Appendix J.2 Undefined Behavior: > > An array subscript is out of range, even if an objec...

...utex and take same > mutex within notifier probably means it's broken for ksm and rmap at > least since these call invalidate with lock taken. > > And generally, Andrea told me offline one can not take mutex under > the notifier callback. I CC'd Andrea for why. Correct, you _can not_ take mutex or any sleeping lock from within the invalidate_range callback as those callback happens under the page table spinlock. You can however do so under the invalidate_range_start call- back only if it is a blocking allow callback (there is a flag passdown with the invalidate_range_start...

...utex and take same > mutex within notifier probably means it's broken for ksm and rmap at > least since these call invalidate with lock taken. > > And generally, Andrea told me offline one can not take mutex under > the notifier callback. I CC'd Andrea for why. Correct, you _can not_ take mutex or any sleeping lock from within the invalidate_range callback as those callback happens under the page table spinlock. You can however do so under the invalidate_range_start call- back only if it is a blocking allow callback (there is a flag passdown with the invalidate_range_start...

...bably means it's broken for ksm and rmap at > > > least since these call invalidate with lock taken. > > > > > > And generally, Andrea told me offline one can not take mutex under > > > the notifier callback. I CC'd Andrea for why. > > Correct, you _can not_ take mutex or any sleeping lock from within the > > invalidate_range callback as those callback happens under the page table > > spinlock. You can however do so under the invalidate_range_start call- > > back only if it is a blocking allow callback (there is a flag passdown &...

hello, i am looking for advice regarding the best repo from which to download "markdown" for use on a mac. on my ubuntu machine i just installed some standard markdown package with apt-get. but i have not found anything equivalent for my mac machine. i am looking for a maintained package from a reputable repo site that can be automatically installed and upgraded using the packaging

..., so... so they should be visible, no matter of the authorisation way. Aslo, home folders (or at least document subfolder) should mount automaticly from authorisation server (linux boxes does it automatically right now so I don't want to destroy it), changing password should be global, pasword _can not_ be send throught the net without encryption. As you see, it is a quite big thing. I'm reading documentation a long time, but I do need some advices/links/anything. -- ---------------> Advocatus Diaboli - someone should do this job. some kind of Molot some kind of monster ;) jid:mol...

...> mutex within notifier probably means it's broken for ksm and rmap at >> least since these call invalidate with lock taken. >> >> And generally, Andrea told me offline one can not take mutex under >> the notifier callback. I CC'd Andrea for why. > Correct, you _can not_ take mutex or any sleeping lock from within the > invalidate_range callback as those callback happens under the page table > spinlock. You can however do so under the invalidate_range_start call- > back only if it is a blocking allow callback (there is a flag passdown > with the in...

...I recompiled the kernel with the following built-in options: [*] 802.1d Ethernet Bridging [*] QoS and/or fair queueing <*> HTB packet scheduler <*> SFQ queue [*] QoS support <*> Firewall based classifier <*> U32 classifier I can mark packages with iptables, but I _can''t_ make the packages get queued in an specific class. Please, take a look on this sample script that guarantees 64kbit (rate), 72kbit (ceil) to the packets coming from the host 172.16.0.185 to the 172.16.1.0/24 network with 10000-10100 destination ports: # Flush tc qdiscs: /sbin/tc qd...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan@xensource.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:16 AM > To: Dave Thompson (davetho) > Cc: Xen Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Hotplug scripts not working... > xen/ia64 domU stoppedworking > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:51:24AM -0500, Dave Thompson > (davetho) wrote: > > >

...according to C semantics, the two indices alias if the _flattened representation of the indices alias_. Consider the parameter values: ``` n = m = 3 x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 ``` Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. In contrast, many langagues other than C require that index expressions for multidimensional arrays have each component within the array dimension for that component. As a result, in the example above, the index pair `...

...on of the indices alias_. Consider the parameter >> values: >> >> ``` >> n = m = 3 >> x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 >> x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 >> ``` >> >> Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and >> so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. >> >> >> In contrast, many langagues other than C require that index >> expressions for multidimensional arrays have each component within the >> array dimension for that component....

...esentation of the indices alias_. Consider the parameter > values: > > ``` > n = m = 3 > x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 > x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 > ``` > > Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and > so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. > > > In contrast, many langagues other than C require that index > expressions for multidimensional arrays have each component within the > array dimension for that component. As a re...

...he parameter >>> values: >>> >>> ``` >>> n = m = 3 >>> x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 >>> x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 >>> ``` >>> >>> Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and >>> so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. >>> >>> >>> In contrast, many langagues other than C require that index >>> expressions for multidimensional arrays have each component within the >>> array dimen...

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:18:12AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote: > +static const struct mmu_notifier_ops vhost_mmu_notifier_ops = { > + .invalidate_range = vhost_invalidate_range, > +}; > + > void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, > struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit) > { I also wonder here: when page is write protected then it does not look like

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:18:12AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote: > +static const struct mmu_notifier_ops vhost_mmu_notifier_ops = { > + .invalidate_range = vhost_invalidate_range, > +}; > + > void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, > struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit) > { I also wonder here: when page is write protected then it does not look like

...gt; > > > > ``` > > > n = m = 3 > > > x1 = 1, y1 = 0; B[x1][y1] = nx1+y1 = 3*1+0=3 > > > x2 = 0, y2 = 3; B[x2][y2] = nx2+y2 = 3*0+3=3 > > > ``` > > > > > > Hence, the array elements `B[x1][y1]` and `B[x2][y2]` _can alias_, and > > > so the transformation proposed in `ex1_opt` is unsound in general. > > > > > > > > > In contrast, many langagues other than C require that index > > > expressions for multidimensional arrays have each component within the &g...

Warning - Puppet newby here. I am trying to set up a puppetmaster 3.3.2 and have run into a snag right out of the box. I want to add a new directory to modulepath= in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf So I added the following line in the [main] header modulepath = /etc/puppet/modules:/opt/our-repo/puppetmaster/modules And populated new new directory with modules I have written. I then run puppet