search for: _by

...with unknown participants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. Now probably you can imagine why they are giving the certificates out for free. US authorities can compromise all of them - without any "open knowledge". It would be dead easy to prevent this fake for the guys at mozilla or google (for the web), but they don't. All that is neede...

Dear all, First thanks for the good job! Samba allowed me to switch from M$ slavery to Freedom of Free Softwares I like so much :-)) Here is a precision on the bug number 26128 I've posted by 9th of December 2002. The EXCEL 97 file has become corrupted _by Samba_.. I don't understand how this could happen but it seems samba logger just logged in the Excel file directly. Here is what I can see in the Excel file, editing it with vim, in the middle of Microsoft crappy file: (Sorry, I still have to anonymyse the file since it contains confidential b...

...&apropos=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current>. It seems the escape sequences do not work. I have tried both using the command like option and an ssh-config file and the results are the same - it seems the escape sequences do not get expanded. The example below shows that the option is _seen _by ssh, but the esacpe sequences are not expanded. sftp -v -oPasswordAuthentication=no -oIdentityFile=/var/opt/oss/data/config/ssh/%h_%r_id_dsa temip at bt1sss5t Connecting to bt1sss5t... OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005 debug1: Reading configuration data /usr/local/etc/ssh_config...

...rticipants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its > true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way > to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all > necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. > Now probably you can imagine why they are giving the certificates out for > free. US authorities can compromise all of them - without any "open knowledge". Wow, you packed a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (and some misinformation) into one paragraph.? I'll leave it...

Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: > To the issue: I also don't see what your point is. > R works with these so libraries as intended in all cases as > far as we know, and so I don't understand why anything needs to > be changed. > All these libraries "belong to R" and are tied to a specific > version of R and are not be used

...ot be a "Certificate Authority" in its > > true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap > > way to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all > > necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. > > Certificate authorities, including Let's Encrypt, operate on Certificate > Signing Requests, not Private Keys. Some CAs do offer private key > generation in their services for the user's convenience, but it is not > recommended (obviously) and in no way requi...

Am 2018-10-30 08:06, schrieb Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.: > > Yeah.....I guess that's one way to look at it. > > My biggest worry? Is I've placed so much time and effort "getting to > know" Fedora and its intricacies, idiosyncrasies, its ins and > outs...dealt with ridicule on this very same list when I first > started, have "cut my teeth" on

...o to support such characteristics. Without supporting this feature, EXTLINUX fails to boot (or rather it fails to be installed correctly) in ext4 when the fs includes such "64bit" characteristic(s). Back then, the request was mainly relevant for certain distros that were already using _by default_ the "64bit" feature when formatting with ext4, for whichever volume size (even for "small" ones). With the release of version 1.43 of e2fsprogs (2016May), the "64bit" feature is enabled by default (quote from the release notes): "Mke2fs will now creat...

...rticipants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its > true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way > to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all > necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. Certificate authorities, including Let's Encrypt, operate on Certificate Signing Requests, not Private Keys. Some CAs do offer private key generation in their services for the user's convenience, but it is not recommended (obviously) and in no way required. Getting a CA to sign...

...rticipants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its > true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way > to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all > necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. > Now probably you can imagine why they are giving the certificates out for > free. US authorities can compromise all of them - without any "open knowledge". Wow, you packed a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (and some misinformation) into one paragraph. I'll leave it...

...The author clearly knew what he/she was doing: char className[256]; strncpy(className, name, 255); // Avoid evil people out there... Appears later. I found this amusing. Anyway I hope it''s apparent this is exploitable. xosview doesn''t appear to drop privs. Also, that is _by no means the only vulnerable section of code_, just the stupidest bit. Temp. (and probably permanent) solution: "chmod u-s `which xosview`. Anyway well done RedHat for "blunder of the week". Still fuming, Chris PS. Whilst you''re at it RedHat, fix the X libraries (new sec...

...annot be a "Certificate Authority" in its >> true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way >> to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all >> necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. >> Now probably you can imagine why they are giving the certificates out for >> free. US authorities can compromise all of them - without any "open knowledge". > > Wow, you packed a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (and some > misinformation) into one paragra...

...x/libs/Matrix.so /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/Matrix/libs/Matrix.so /usr/local/lib/R-devel/lib/R/library/Matrix/libs/Matrix.so edd at max:~$ I have three versions of Matrix.so. And still not problem. The third one only enters for R-devel, not R. The first two are distinguished by R itself _by virtue of different paths_ just like Martin and I told you. And _no_ other program on my system knows about Matrix.so: edd at max:~$ ldconfig -p | grep Matrix.so edd at max:~$ ldconfig -p | wc -l 2814 edd at max:~$ ldd / ldconfig do NOT know Matrix.so -- as I told you before -- despite t...

...ertificate Authority" in its > > > true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap > > > way to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all > > > necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. > > > > Certificate authorities, including Let's Encrypt, operate on Certificate > > Signing Requests, not Private Keys. Some CAs do offer private key > > generation in their services for the user's convenience, but it is not > > recommended (obvio...

Dear Alex; Thanks for your kindly reply. Please explain for me what do u mean exactly in "a la" in the following sentence u wrote it below? " in SIP, this can be done via "re-INVITEs" a la the canreinvite= option for SIP peers in sip.conf" Another thing, do u mean that it is easier (better) if we need H.323 endpoint to talk with SIP endpoint then we use full

...be the last one to come out. Before a corporate agenda will "merge" it with their general philosophy. _//_ _//__//_ _//_To me it looks pathetic that a lively profitable entity with an entirely different corporate psychology is consumed by big conglomerates. What for? _//_ _//__//_ _//_By the way I am 60 and been following Linux/Linus since Kernel 0.99. Some time before RedHat appeared strong on the scene."_//_ _//__//_ _//_Andreas - 10.2018 _/ It might not be a "PROBABLE" scenario...but its is a POSSIBLE one! What would that entail? Just because Red Hat is a stron...

Hi Folks, A while ago (September 2007) I set up an experimental Debian 4.0 Etch installation, and installed R on it, along with several packages -- including e1071 and the "Bundle" VR -- by means of the Debian package manager. Most of the time, R works fine. But not always. Just now, I wanted to try the code suggested by Johannes H?sing for "Stroparia"'s Multiset

Hi.. I need some support... table: week_id, user_id, project_id, hours ex. => 33, 2, 1, 10 34, 2,1,15 33, 2, 2, 20 35, 3, 1,20 etc. Want to display a sum of hours per week_id per user_id I have: @hours = HourUser.includes(:user).group_by { |h| h.week_id } @hours.keys.sort.each do |hour| @hours[hour].collect(&:stunden).sum Hours are summed up, but not sorted by user_id.. How to get that? Thanks Werner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=429 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-26 00:29 MET ------- When you do this: netstat -an | grep LISTEN do you see 0.0.0.0:9080 or does the 9080 line list a specific IP? Also, is 216.152.242.200 the primary IP address of the incoming interface, or a secondary? -- Configure bugmail:

...ocal/lib/R/site-library/Matrix/libs/Matrix.so > /usr/local/lib/R-devel/lib/R/library/Matrix/libs/Matrix.so > edd at max:~$ > I have three versions of Matrix.so. And still not problem. The third one > only enters for R-devel, not R. The first two are distinguished by R itself > _by virtue of different paths_ just like Martin and I told you. > And _no_ other program on my system knows about Matrix.so: > edd at max:~$ ldconfig -p | grep Matrix.so > edd at max:~$ ldconfig -p | wc -l > 2814 > edd at max:~$ > ldd / ldconfig do NOT know Matrix.so -- as...