Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "_business_".
2017 Aug 10
8
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
...rtificate is not its issuer, but the "trusted" third party CA.
This could have been known way before of course by simply thinking about the
basics. Do you really think your certificate gets more trustworthy because
some guys from South Africa (just an example) say it is correct, running a
_business_? Honestly, that is just naive.
It would be far better to use a self-signed certificate that can be checked
through some instance/host set inside your domain. Because only then the only
one being responsible and trustworthy is yourself. And that is the way it
should be.
Everything else involving thi...
2017 Aug 10
4
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
..."trusted" third party CA.
>> This could have been known way before of course by simply thinking about the
>> basics. Do you really think your certificate gets more trustworthy because
>> some guys from South Africa (just an example) say it is correct, running a
>> _business_? Honestly, that is just naive.
>> It would be far better to use a self-signed certificate that can be checked
>> through some instance/host set inside your domain. Because only then the only
>> one being responsible and trustworthy is yourself. And that is the way it
>> shou...
2017 Aug 10
0
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
...issuer, but the "trusted" third party CA.
> This could have been known way before of course by simply thinking about the
> basics. Do you really think your certificate gets more trustworthy because
> some guys from South Africa (just an example) say it is correct, running a
> _business_? Honestly, that is just naive.
> It would be far better to use a self-signed certificate that can be checked
> through some instance/host set inside your domain. Because only then the only
> one being responsible and trustworthy is yourself. And that is the way it
> should be.
> Ever...
2017 Aug 10
0
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
...the "trusted" third party CA.
SvK> This could have been known way before of course by simply thinking about the
SvK> basics. Do you really think your certificate gets more trustworthy because
SvK> some guys from South Africa (just an example) say it is correct, running a
SvK> _business_? Honestly, that is just naive.
SvK> It would be far better to use a self-signed certificate that can be checked
SvK> through some instance/host set inside your domain. Because only then the only
SvK> one being responsible and trustworthy is yourself. And that is the way it
SvK> should b...
2017 Aug 10
0
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
...arty CA.
>>> This could have been known way before of course by simply thinking
>about the
>>> basics. Do you really think your certificate gets more trustworthy
>because
>>> some guys from South Africa (just an example) say it is correct,
>running a
>>> _business_? Honestly, that is just naive.
>>> It would be far better to use a self-signed certificate that can be
>checked
>>> through some instance/host set inside your domain. Because only then
>the only
>>> one being responsible and trustworthy is yourself. And that is the...
2017 Aug 09
5
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
So i?m using dovecot, and i created a self signed certificate with mkcert.sh based on dovecot-openssl.cnf. The name in there matches my mail server.
The first time it connects in mac mail however, it says the certificate is invalid and another server might pretend to be me etc.
I then have the option of trusting it.
Is this normal behaviour? Will it always be invalid if it?s not signed by a