Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_based_".
Did you mean:
_based
2005 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] can bc/asm carry enough type info for C/C++ compiler/interpreter?
I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the following:
1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so)
2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter)
3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in precompiled bc
Motivation:
The class files produced by the java compiler carries sufficient information that another pass of compilation of java source can be done by including clas/jar files only:
A.java => A.class
B.java => B.class
C.java => C.class
[ABC].class => A...
2005 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] can bc/asm carry enough type info for C/C++ compiler/interpreter?
...pport the
> following:
>
> 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so)
You can do this today, e.g., with lli -load=native.so file.bc
> 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter)
You can also do this today as well.
> 3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in
> precompiled bc
OK, I didn't quite understand what you meant at first, but it makes
sense with the rest of your message. See the end of my response.
> Motivation:
[skip java-related stuff]
> Given that llvm bytecode might become a viable distribution format
> _i...