search for: _as_

Hi, The centos.org home page says CentOS-3 is based on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 ES. Would I be able to run >2 processors and >8GB memory on CentOS-3 (what RHEL _AS_ supports), or am I limited to what RHEL ES supports? Thank you for your time. ~z -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

Hello experts, We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging. Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU (disk staging). The customer would like to know if it is best to use ZFS or VxFS as file system inside Netbackup disk staging in order to get the best performance possible. Could you provide some information regarding this

After upgrading rc2 -> rc4 (suse binary packages) line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his homedirectory in logfile smbd says: [2003/09/25 15:07:59, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(384) user 'xxxx' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (xxxx) Hannu

...:a9) from it's ethernet interface, 2) WB forwards the the bcast frame to the WLAN AP via a unicast WLAN frame (this is normal behavior), 3) WLAN APs, by default, take 'unicast encapsulated' broadcast frames received on the WLAN interface and rebroadcast them on the air _as_ broadcast frames (this occurs inside the WLAN mac layer so any bridging in the AP itself would have no effect on this problem), 4) The WB picks up the rebroadcasted bcast frame and forwards it to the wire, hence the broadcast frame shows up on the wire twice. In a bridge situa...

..., and i was under such horrible pressure and extremely nasty circumstances that i couldn't handle either. in all, things went from really good and a lot of fun to extremely nasty, in a very short space of time. i wish that things were better than they were (i do not wish that things were _as_ they were) such that the shit that happened could never ever happen to me OR to anyone else. now it's extremely frustrating because the things that need to happen still have not happened, and the users of microsoft products are lining microsoft's pockets, the US dept of Justice and...

Luke, What is your problem? Sounds like you have a huge chip missing from your shoulder. Get over it! Paul Gregory Unix and Oracle Database Administrator paul.gregory@gnf.com -----Original Message----- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [mailto:lkcl@samba-tng.org] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:23 PM To: Jeremy Allison Cc: samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-announce@samba.org

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works