search for: _allows_

..._access PAM module ('account' clause) to do user validation (described below). On Win2000, this works fine - if an unauthorized user tries to login, Win2000 says 'Account not permitted to login at this time' (or something along those lines), and disallows the login. But WinXP _allows_ the login to proceed, but refuses to map any drives (home directory) and disallows access to PDC shares. In this way, the user has access to local disks and resources. Can someone try to replicate and find the source of this bug? I'm seeing it on two different WinXP machines, and on no Win2...

Hi, All Two remote tinc nodes(A, B) advertised the same route to the Tinc domain, and the local tinc node(C) has two ConnectTo to point to those two remote nodes, and I found, and let’s assume connection from C to A is better than C to B (better latency from ping) : 1. when two remote nodes are up, the traffic always send through A 2. when A is down, traffic send through B 3. when A recovered,

Hello, Am Thu, 4 May 2017 15:45:52 +0800 schrieb Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com>: > [..] > > So I would like to know, the underlying mechanism for equal path of Subnet is > what? Tinc will test the latency, or something else to make the decision? tinc only _allows_ certain traffic to pass - it does no routing on its own. You will need to manipulate your routing setup with the subnet-up/down scripts: * assign different weights to both subnets * use the weight for the route metric * make sure to add the route in subnet-up and remove it in subnet-down Cheers,...

...lause) to do user validation (described below). > > On Win2000, this works fine - if an unauthorized user tries to > login, Win2000 says 'Account not permitted to login at this time' (or > something along those lines), and disallows the login. > > But WinXP _allows_ the login to proceed, but refuses to map any > drives (home directory) and disallows access to PDC shares. In this way, > the user has access to local disks and resources. > > Can someone try to replicate and find the source of this bug? I'm seeing > it on two different WinXP mac...

Sebastian, LLVM does define a common function call and struct/array/pointer model. You could use that to define a language-interoperability scheme, but I think it would require some special support from the front-ends to translate functions exposed to a different language to conform with the scheme, or to generate wrappers for them. For example, calling a Fortran function (call-by-reference)

.... For example, calling a Fortran function > (call-by-reference) from C (call-by-value) would not work automatically -- > something has to generate wrappers to allow the call. The scheme would have > to define an object model and exceptions model. Another way of putting this is that LLVM _allows_ the code to interoperate, but, like a microprocessor, does not establish any conventions that makes interoperability happen automatically. In Vikram's example, if you are interfacing C to a language with pass by reference parameters, either the programmer can be required to prototype those par...

Hi all, I am an LLVM newbie, thinking about using LLVM as the platform for a toy language. In this respect, I was wondering if LLVM could be used to easily weave code written in different language. For instance, let's assume I have a library written in C, some components written in C++ and some components written in OCaml (we also assume an OCaml backend for LLVM). All this code gets

...ion sub-bodies and passing in the function pointers to said outlined bodies to OpenMP helpers lets us correctly implement the semantics we need. However, unless I severely misunderstood the thread, I thought the key idea was to move *away* from that representation and towards a representation that _allows_ optimization? [XT]: Your understanding is correct. But, the IR-level region annotation RFC is not just for OpenMP. OpenMP is one of usage cases.. >>>>My problem with representing parallel regions with intrinsic-denoted-regions is that we're lying to the optimizer about what the...

...ion sub-bodies and passing in the function pointers to said outlined bodies to OpenMP helpers lets us correctly implement the semantics we need. However, unless I severely misunderstood the thread, I thought the key idea was to move *away* from that representation and towards a representation that _allows_ optimization? My problem with representing parallel regions with intrinsic-denoted-regions is that we're lying to the optimizer about what the code actually does. Calls, even to intrinsics, can "at worst" do some combination of the following: - Write to and read from arbitrary mem...

Hi Sanjoy, Yes, that's exactly what we have been looking at recently here, but the region tags seem to make it possible to express the control flow as well, so I think we could start with reg ions+metadata, as Hal and Xinmin proposed, and then figure out what needs to be first class instructions. --Vikram Adve > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at