Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_ad_hominem_".
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks
On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:56 AM, dag at cray.com wrote:
>> Ping at appropriate time intervals (~3 days is sane);
>
> 3 days is *not* sane. The fact that we require pings at all indicates a
> broken process. I don't understand why there is such resistance to a
> patch queue. I don't even care about the revision control system as
> much as I do about a managed patch
2012 Nov 16
4
[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks
Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes:
>> I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request
>> tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor
>> it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be
>> buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can
>> be