search for: __x86_indirect_thunk_edx

...espond to more of this when i have more time. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang in > 32-bit mode? __x86_indirect_thunk __x86_indirect_thunk_eax __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx __x86_indirect_thunk_edx > I've added __x86_indirect_thunk for 32-bit now, and if > that's *all* the Clang is using then I'll possibly switch GCC into that > mode too. > > Can you take care of filing the tickets for %V0 and "=q" > and attribute__((indirect_branch("keep")...

...> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> > wrote: > > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang > > in > > 32-bit mode? > __x86_indirect_thunk > __x86_indirect_thunk_eax > __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx > __x86_indirect_thunk_edx Thanks. And you'll *never* do __x86_indirect_thunk (the ret-equivalent one) on 64-bit, right? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5213 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pi...

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:16 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Here are my exact versions: >     llvm: 3afd566557f3 ("AMDGPU: Add 32-bit constant address space") >     clang: 848874aed95a ("[clang-format] Fix ObjC message arguments formatting.") OK, mine are slightly newer than that now, but I now get a working 64- bit defconfig build. It'll still break with any PV

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:44:32PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 10:11 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:49:25AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Hm, please could we also have the %V asm constraint modifier? That > > > allows us to emit calls to the thunks from inline asm using the > > > register that the