search for: __value

...37,25 +37,6 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \ #define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") -#define dma_rmb() rmb() -#define dma_wmb() wmb() - -#define smp_store_mb(__var, __value) \ - do { WRITE_ONCE(__var, __value); membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0) - -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -#define smp_mb() mb() -#define smp_rmb() rmb() -#define smp_wmb() wmb() -#else -#define smp_mb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") -#define smp_rmb() __asm__ __volatile_...

...37,25 +37,6 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \ #define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") -#define dma_rmb() rmb() -#define dma_wmb() wmb() - -#define smp_store_mb(__var, __value) \ - do { WRITE_ONCE(__var, __value); membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0) - -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -#define smp_mb() mb() -#define smp_rmb() rmb() -#define smp_wmb() wmb() -#else -#define smp_mb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") -#define smp_rmb() __asm__ __volatile_...

...antiated from: __inline_mathcodeNP_ (double, func, arg, code) \ ^ /usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:530:1: note: instantiated from: __inline_mathcodeNP (floor, __x, \ ^ /usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:543:9: note: instantiated from: : "=t" (__value), "=&q" (__ignore), "=m" (__cwtmp), \ ^ /usr/include/bits/mathinline.h:530:1: error: invalid output constraint '=t' in asm __inline_mathcodeNP (floor, __x, \ ^ ... any idea? thanks, Jonas ________________________________ From: James.Mol...

I have a new problem: Register RBP is used in a function foo. (I am not allocating RBP to any virtual register, the instances of RBP in function foo are in the machine code when my register allocator starts.) Function foo calls function bar. Register RBP is not saved across the call, though it is live after the call. Function bar includes a virtual register. The code that I'm using to

...dr_t; typedef char *__caddr_t; typedef long int __intptr_t; typedef unsigned int __socklen_t; typedef struct _IO_FILE FILE; typedef struct _IO_FILE __FILE; typedef int wchar_t; typedef unsigned int wint_t; typedef struct { int __count; union { wint_t __wch; char __wchb[4]; } __value; } __mbstate_t; typedef struct { __off_t __pos; __mbstate_t __state; } _G_fpos_t; typedef struct { __off64_t __pos; __mbstate_t __state; } _G_fpos64_t; enum { __GCONV_OK = 0, __GCONV_NOCONV, __GCONV_NODB, __GCONV_NOMEM, __GCONV_EMPTY_INPUT, __GCONV_FULL_OUTPUT, __GCONV_ILLEGAL...

...follows non-static declaration static inline int setenv(const char *name, const char *value, int overwrite) { ^ /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk/usr/include/stdlib.h:237:6: note: previous declaration is here int setenv(const char * __name, const char * __value, int __overwrite) __DARWIN_ALIAS(setenv); ^ /Users/deantrasente/Documents/GitHub/nut/drivers/snmp-ups.c:783:10: warning: assigning to 'char *' from 'u_char *' (aka 'unsigned char *') converts between pointers to integer types with different sign [-Wpointer-sign]...

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

...;}, {"_ZplRK1YRA100_P1X", "operator+(Y const&, X* (&) [100])"}, {"_Z1fno", "f(__int128, unsigned __int128)"}, {"_Z1fM1SKFvvE", "f(void (S::*)() const)"}, {"_Z3ft7IiEN11__enable_ifIXsr16__is_scalar_typeIT_EE7__valueEvE6__typeEv", "__enable_if<__is_scalar_type<int>::__value, void>::__type ft7<int>()"}, {"_Z3ft7IPvEN11__enable_ifIXsr16__is_scalar_typeIT_EE7__valueEvE6__typeEv", "__enable_if<__is_scalar_type<void*>::__value, void>::__type ft7<voi...