Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "__svml_sin_8".
Did you mean:
__svml_sin8
2018 Jul 04
2
[RFC][VECLIB] how should we legalize VECLIB calls?
...ll do this, consider the case where
> "-vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth" option is enabled and vectorizer is
> forced to generate the wider VF, and hence it may generate a call to
> __svml_sin_* which may not exist.
>
> Are you expecting the vectorizer to lower the calls i.e. __svml_sin_8 to
> two __svml_sin_4 calls ?
>
> Regards,
> Ashutosh
>
If an accurate cost model was in place (which there isn't), then an
"unsupported" vectorization factor should only be selected if it was
forced. However, in this case __svml_sin_8 is the same cost as
__svml_sin_4...
2018 Jul 02
8
[RFC][VECLIB] how should we legalize VECLIB calls?
On 07/02/2018 04:33 PM, Saito, Hideki wrote:
>
>
>
> >It may not be a full solution for the problems you're trying to solve
>
>
>
> If we are inventing a new solution, I’d like it also to solve OpenMP
> declare simd legalization issue. If a small extension of existing scheme
>
> works for mathlib only, I’m happy to take that and discuss OpenMP
>