Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "__stack_smash_handler".
2005 Nov 18
0
WIne 0.9x crash on make
...-0.9.1/loader/preloader.c:156: undefined
reference to `__guard'
preloader.o(.text+0x1f):/mnt/downloads/Winestuff/wine-0.9.1/loader/preloader.c:156:
undefined reference to `__guard'
preloader.o(.text+0x3b):/mnt/downloads/Winestuff/wine-0.9.1/loader/preloader.c:156:
undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
preloader.o(.text+0x73): In function `wld_mmap':
/mnt/downloads/Winestuff/wine-0.9.1/loader/preloader.c:235: undefined
reference to `__guard'
preloader.o(.text+0xea):/mnt/downloads/Winestuff/wine-0.9.1/loader/preloader.c:257:
undefined reference to `__guard'
preloader.o(.text+0x1...
2009 Apr 12
4
Problem to compile wine on hardened sources
...ened-sources ...
actually using ...
kernel -> 2.6.28-hardened-r7 #1 SMP Mon Apr 6 17:41:50 CEST 2009 x86_64
gcc -> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
Code:
__bb_init_func':
preloader.c:(.text+0x4f): undefined reference to `__guard'
preloader.c:(.text+0x70): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
preloader.o: In function `__stack_chk_fail_local':
preloader.c:(.text+0x8e): undefined reference to `__guard'
preloader.c:(.text+0xaf): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
preloader.o: In function `__stack_chk_fail':
preloader.c:(.text+0xcd): undefined reference to `...
2003 Aug 24
1
ibm fstack protector
yo, ive been using the fstack protector for a while now and it worked
fine until i was gonna compile 4.8p3 then i got these errors,
sio.o(.text+0x18b7): undefined reference to `__guard'
sio.o(.text+0x1da9): undefined reference to `__guard'
sio.o(.text+0x1db9): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
vga_isa.o: In function `isavga_probe':
vga_isa.o(.text+0x10): undefined reference to `__guard'
vga_isa.o(.text+0xb9): undefined reference to `__guard'
vga_isa.o(.text+0xc9): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
vga_isa.o(.text+0xc9): undefined reference to `__stack_sm...
2005 Oct 01
1
error on loading zaptel module
i get this error on dmesg:
zaptel: Unknown symbol __stack_smash_handler
zaptel: Unknown symbol __guard
paradise dove
2009 Jan 24
1
[LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input
...t;idr_init" undefined error, but the symbol is present in my vmlinux.
If I turn make those modules built into the kernel it works then (sctp,
w1, thermalsysfs).
It looks like I'll also have to submit some patches for ARCH=um, because
I get undefined references to __bad_size, __guard, and
__stack_smash_handler. __bad_size is probably because LLVM didn't inline expand + DCE something GCC did.
With an unpatched LLVM I would also need weak attributes to be on the
function type, instead of the return type,
but I think thats an LLVM bug, and a one-line patch corrects it.
> If yes then this doesnt lo...
2006 May 06
2
can''t find a register in class `BREG'' while reloading `asm''
...as apparently resolved by
the elimination of some (all?) of the hardened flags during compilation:
"-nopie fixed the originally reported error, but I subsequently got
other errors that said something like "undefined reference to
`__guard''" and "undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler''".
Adding -fno-stack-protector seems to have solved these as well, and
I''m now compiling the kernels for the crusoe."
My gcc version is:
gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo Hardened 3.4.6-r1, ssp-3.4.5-1.0, pie-8.7.9)
I started off with 3.4.5 and similar or identical parameters f...
2009 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input
* Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source
> >> compilers too.
> >>
> >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result
> >> so it's
2009 Jan 24
5
[LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input
On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source
>> compilers too.
>>
>> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result
>> so it's not an unconditional 'yes'. But ... how much it actually matters
>> depends on
2006 May 26
3
Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
Hi,
first sorry for cross-posting but I thought this patch might interest
-CURRENT users as well as people concerned by security.
I wrote a patch that integrates ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD, one step
further than it has been realized so far.
It is available here :
http://tataz.chchile.org/~tataz/FreeBSD/SSP/
Everything is explained on the web page, but I will repeat some
informations here.