search for: __sparc64_barrier_h

...ends() do { } while (0) - #define smp_store_release(p, v) \ do { \ compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \ @@ -74,4 +55,6 @@ do { \ #define smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier() #define smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier() +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h> + #endif /* !(__SPARC64_BARRIER_H) */ diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h index 2fe99e6..9da9646 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h @@ -5,7 +5,4 @@ #else #include <asm/processor_32.h> #endif - -#define nop() __asm__ __v...

...ends() do { } while (0) - #define smp_store_release(p, v) \ do { \ compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \ @@ -74,4 +55,6 @@ do { \ #define smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier() #define smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier() +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h> + #endif /* !(__SPARC64_BARRIER_H) */ diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h index 2fe99e6..9da9646 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h @@ -5,7 +5,4 @@ #else #include <asm/processor_32.h> #endif - -#define nop() __asm__ __v...

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the