search for: __simd64_uint8_t

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__simd64_uint8_t".

Did you mean: __simd64_int8_t
2010 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...a VCEQ.P8, even though that's what Clang generates. Putting them into structures doesn't help because of the type names being irrelevant, both names become %struct.__simd64_int8_t %struct.__simd64_int8_t = type { <8 x i8> } %struct.__simd64_poly8_t = type { <8 x i8> } %struct.__simd64_uint8_t = type { <8 x i8> } @u8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 @i8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 @p8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 The difference between uint8x8 and int8x8 is done via 'ns...
2010 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
On Sep 27, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: >> But regardless they are still structures, right? What does it mean for them to map onto other types? Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types? If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector
2010 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...what Clang generates. > > Putting them into structures doesn't help because of the type names > being irrelevant, both names become %struct.__simd64_int8_t > > %struct.__simd64_int8_t = type { <8 x i8> } > %struct.__simd64_poly8_t = type { <8 x i8> } > %struct.__simd64_uint8_t = type { <8 x i8> } > > @u8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 > @i8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 > @p8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8 > > The difference between uint8x8...
2010 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: > But regardless they are still structures, right?  What does it mean for them to map onto other types?  Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types?  If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector types.  I had read those statements to say something about the