search for: __sanitizer

...elated to "word"... Reading symbols from a...done. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/wink/foss/llvm.3.9.0/test-msan/a [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<123145302310912ul, 8796093022208ul, 8ul, __sanitizer::SizeClassMap<17ul, 128ul, 16ul>, __msan::MsanMapUnmapCallback>::AllocateBatch ( this=this at entry=0x21289a0 <__msan::allocator>, stat=stat at entry=0x2128970 <__msan::fallback_allocator_cache+10939...

First off, thanks -- this is a pretty great library and it feels like I'm learning a lot. I'm getting some more experience with libfuzzer and finding that I have a couple of questions: - How does libfuzzer decide to write a new test file? What distinguishes this one from all the other cases for which new test inputs were not written? Must be something about the path taken through the

...help. :) > > Ok, that's good advice. -- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150811/0323f018/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- #0 atomic_exchange<__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t> (mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire, v=2, a=0x640000001290) #1 __sanitizer::BlockingMutex::Lock (this=this at entry=0x640000001290) at /home/brian/tmp/testing/llvm_src/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:471 #2 0x0000000000447899 in GenericScop...

...;word"... Reading symbols from eventfd...done. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/wink/foss/llvm.3.9.0/test-eventfd/eventfd [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<123145302310912ul, 8796093022208ul, 8ul, __sanitizer::SizeClassMap<17ul, 128ul, 16ul>, __msan::MsanMapUnmapCallback>::AllocateBatch ( this=this at entry=0x212c9a0 <__msan::allocator>, stat=stat at entry=0x212c970 <__msan::fallback_allocator_cache+10939...

...ion Codes: EXC_I386_GPFLT Thread 0:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff98f915da syscall_thread_switch + 10 1 libsystem_platform.dylib 0x00007fff965f982d _OSSpinLockLockSlow + 63 2 libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib 0x00000001063d5e4d __sanitizer::BlockingMutex::Lock() + 29 3 libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib 0x00000001063db7bb __sanitizer::ThreadRegistry::CreateThread(unsigned long, bool, unsigned int, void*) + 43 Thread 1: 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff98f9648a __semwait_signal + 10 1 libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dyli...

...there any way to build an android static lib? How about for arm-linux? Thanks, Greg diff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h b/lib/interception/interception.h index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 --- a/lib/interception/interception.h +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T; +//typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; +//typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T; // H...

...ake.sh for details. > > Thanks, > Greg > > > diff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h > b/lib/interception/interception.h > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T; > +//typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; > +//typedef _...

I've "successfully" built 3.9.0 release but when I run "ninja check-all" I got 208 Unexpected failures: Expected Passes : 33997 Expected Failures : 198 Unsupported Tests : 685 Unexpected Failures: 208 Below is the log I captured running "time ninja check-all | tee ninja-check-all.txt" https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-KTY7zi7eZHU2hGYTRtd01QZjA

...> >> > diff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h >> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T; >> > +/...

I blame this line in lsan/lit_tests/lit.cfg: # Setup attributes common for all compiler-rt projects. compiler_rt_lit_cfg = os.path.join(llvm_src_root, "projects", "compiler-rt", "lib", "lit.common.cfg") On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > > On Fri, May 24,

...gt; Greg > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h > > b/lib/interception/interception.h > > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 > > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h > > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h > > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; > > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; > > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; > > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; > > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; > > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T; > > +//typedef __sanitizer::OF...

..._GPFLT > > Thread 0:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread > 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff98f915da syscall_thread_switch + 10 > 1 libsystem_platform.dylib 0x00007fff965f982d _OSSpinLockLockSlow + 63 > 2 libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib 0x00000001063d5e4d __sanitizer::BlockingMutex::Lock() + 29 > 3 libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib 0x00000001063db7bb __sanitizer::ThreadRegistry::CreateThread(unsigned long, bool, unsigned int, void*) + 43 > > Thread 1: > 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff98f9648a __semwait_signal + 10 > 1 libclang...

...iff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64...

...iff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64...

...rception/interception.h >>>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >>>> > -typedef __sani...

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > I worded that poorly, the Jenkins check I added will explain to the user > that we know this fails sometimes. > > On Jan 20, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> > wrote: > > I have added a Jenkins check for this test, which explains why it fails on

...n.h >>>>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>>>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>>>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >>>>>...

...rception/interception.h >>>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >>>> > -typedef __sani...

...>> > b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>>> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644 >>>>>> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>>> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h >>>>>> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr SIZE_T; >>>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr SSIZE_T; >>>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::sptr PTRDIFF_T; >>>>>> > typedef __sanitizer::s64 INTMAX_T; >>>>>> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T OFF_T; >&...

...ic:548:5: note: candidate found by name lookup is 'std::__1::memory_order::memory_order_relaxed' memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_consume, memory_order_acquire, ^ ../src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic.h:22:3: note: candidate found by name lookup is '__sanitizer::memory_order::memory_order_relaxed' memory_order_relaxed = 1 << 0, ^ The problem is due to the combination of the following: 1. The runtime includes the system headers after the project headers (as per LLVM coding guidelines). 2. lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h pollute...