search for: __read_once_scalar

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "__read_once_scalar".

2020 Jun 30
0
[PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h
...gt; + +#include <asm/barrier.h> + +/* + * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any + * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result + * in tears! + */ +#define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x)) + +#define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x) \ +({ \ + __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(x); \ + smp_read_barrier_depends(); \ + (typeof(x))__x; \ +}) + +#define READ_ONCE(x) \ +({ \ + compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x); \ + __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x); \ +}) + +#define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val)...
2020 Jul 10
0
[PATCH v3 02/19] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h
...gt; + +#include <asm/barrier.h> + +/* + * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any + * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result + * in tears! + */ +#define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x)) + +#define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x) \ +({ \ + __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(x); \ + smp_read_barrier_depends(); \ + (typeof(x))__x; \ +}) + +#define READ_ONCE(x) \ +({ \ + compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x); \ + __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x); \ +}) + +#define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val)...
2020 Jul 13
1
[PATCH v3 02/19] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h
...> +/* > + * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any > + * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result > + * in tears! > + */ > +#define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x)) > + > +#define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x) \ > +({ \ > + __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(x); \ > + smp_read_barrier_depends(); \ > + (typeof(x))__x; \ > +}) > + > +#define READ_ONCE(x) \ > +({ \ > + compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x); \ Does it make sense if...
2020 Jul 02
2
[PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
...uestion that I didn't dare ask when the same code came up before (I guess it's also what's in the kernel today): With the cast to 'typeof(*p)' at the end, doesn't that mean we lose the effect of __unqual_scalar_typeof() again, so any "volatile" pointer passed into __READ_ONCE_SCALAR() or __smp_load_acquire() still leads to a volatile load of the original variable, plus another volatile access to ___p1 after spilling it to the stack as a non-volatile variable? I hope I'm missing something obvious here. Arnd
2020 Jul 02
2
[PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
...uestion that I didn't dare ask when the same code came up before (I guess it's also what's in the kernel today): With the cast to 'typeof(*p)' at the end, doesn't that mean we lose the effect of __unqual_scalar_typeof() again, so any "volatile" pointer passed into __READ_ONCE_SCALAR() or __smp_load_acquire() still leads to a volatile load of the original variable, plus another volatile access to ___p1 after spilling it to the stack as a non-volatile variable? I hope I'm missing something obvious here. Arnd
2020 Jul 02
0
[PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
...dare ask when the same > code came up before (I guess it's also what's in the kernel today): > > With the cast to 'typeof(*p)' at the end, doesn't that mean we > lose the effect of __unqual_scalar_typeof() again, so any "volatile" > pointer passed into __READ_ONCE_SCALAR() or > __smp_load_acquire() still leads to a volatile load of the original > variable, plus another volatile access to ___p1 after > spilling it to the stack as a non-volatile variable? Not sure I follow you here, but I can confirm that what you're worried about doesn't happen for...
2020 Jul 10
0
[PATCH v3 03/19] asm/rwonce: Allow __READ_ONCE to be overridden by the architecture
...- a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h @@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result * in tears! */ +#ifndef __READ_ONCE #define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x)) +#endif #define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x) \ ({ \ -- 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog
2020 Jul 10
24
[PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE()
Hi all, This is version three of the patches I previously posted here: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630173734.14057-1-will at kernel.org Changes since v2 include: * Actually add the barrier in READ_ONCE() for Alpha! * Implement Alpha's smp_load_acquire() using __READ_ONCE(), rather than the other
2020 Jul 02
2
[PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Rather then relying on the core code to use smp_read_barrier_depends() > as part of the READ_ONCE() definition, instead override __READ_ONCE() > in the Alpha code so that it is treated the same way as > smp_load_acquire(). > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
2020 Jul 02
2
[PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Rather then relying on the core code to use smp_read_barrier_depends() > as part of the READ_ONCE() definition, instead override __READ_ONCE() > in the Alpha code so that it is treated the same way as > smp_load_acquire(). > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
2020 Jun 30
32
[PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE()
Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The
2020 Jun 30
32
[PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE()
Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The