search for: __pthread_mutex_lock

...e might also be a race condition and some bad pointers in chan_local.locals_show. First the segfault. CLI> show locals <unowned> -- 6001@default Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@mars asterisk]# ll -tr total 22260 [...] Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_local.so #0 __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x5d8) at mutex.c:99 99 mutex.c: No such file or directory. in mutex.c (gdb) bt #0 __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x5d8) at mutex.c:99 #1 0x4161ed29 in locals_show (fd=1, argc=2, argv=0xbffff770) at chan_local.c:358 #2 0x08067268 in ast_cli_command (fd=1, s=0x80be7c8 "show...

...for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/xmms [New Thread 1024 (LWP 26534)] [New Thread 2049 (LWP 26535)] [New Thread 1026 (LWP 26536)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 26534)] __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x66910) at mutex.c:99 99 mutex.c: No such file or directory. in mutex.c (gdb) where #0 __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x66910) at mutex.c:99 #1 0x403b0fe8 in __libc_free (mem=0x40464e90) at malloc.c:3152 #2 0x4120b175 in FLAC__bitbuffer_free (bb=0x81c1bd8) at bitbuffer.c:340 #3 0x4120accb...

...t;i386-redhat-linux"... > (gdb) run > Starting program: /usr/bin/xmms > [New Thread 1024 (LWP 26534)] > [New Thread 2049 (LWP 26535)] > [New Thread 1026 (LWP 26536)] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 26534)] > __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x66910) at mutex.c:99 > 99 mutex.c: No such file or directory. > in mutex.c > (gdb) where > #0 __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x66910) at mutex.c:99 > #1 0x403b0fe8 in __libc_free (mem=0x40464e90) at malloc.c:3152 > #2 0x4120b175 in FLAC__bitbuffer_free (bb=0x81c1bd8) at...

I have just released a source distribution which is the candidate for the 1.0.3 release. At this time I would ask anyone who is willing to help test it to do the following: 1. download the tarball and unzip it: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.3_beta-src.tar.gz?download 2. do ./configure && make && make check This will build all code and run all the tests.

...r='-pthread' -Xlinker='-m32' -native -L/home/capitrane/local/timber-llvm//share/timberc-1.0.3/rtsPOSIX ConcMap.bc ParPrimes.bc main.bc -o ParPrimes -lTimberLLVMRTS -lTimberLLVMLIB -v Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb5fe4b70 (LWP 1662)] __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x4) at pthread_mutex_lock.c:50 50 pthread_mutex_lock.c: No such file or directory. in pthread_mutex_lock.c Any tips on how to move on is appreciated. Regards Mattias

...gger output: #0 0x40112aa5 in __sigsuspend (set=0xbfffec10) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigsuspend.c:45 #1 0x40f63079 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal (self=0x40f6bd60) at pthread.c:967 #2 0x40f64d39 in __pthread_alt_lock (lock=0x9203448, self=0x0) at restart.h:34 #3 0x40f61c16 in __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x9203438) at mutex.c:120 #4 0x40f63e12 in __flockfile (stream=0xbfffefa4) at lockfile.c:39 #5 0x40e35ba8 in read_int () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 #6 0x40e35f58 in istream::operator>> () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 #7 0x4093f2e2 in myFunc () at myfunc.cc:347...

...sse2_unaligned_erms 0.04% script/public-i libxapian.so.30.8.0 [.] GlassPostList::init 0.04% script/public-i libxapian.so.30.8.0 [.] MultiMatch::get_mset 0.04% perl perl [.] Perl_op_sibling_splice 0.04% perl libpthread-2.28.so [.] __pthread_mutex_lock 0.04% perl perl [.] Perl_op_convert_list 0.04% git libc-2.28.so [.] __access 0.04% script/public-i libxapian.so.30.8.0 [.] GlassTable::form_key 0.04% script/public-i libstdc++.so.6.0.25 [.] free at plt 0.04% perl...

Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're expecting tens of thousands of public inboxes). After bumping RLIMIT_NOFILE and running ->add_database a bunch, the actual queries seem to be taking ~30s (not good :x). Now I'm

...3opt7ArgList10getLastArgIJNS0_12OptSpecifierEEEEPNS0_3ArgEDpT_ 17 _ZN3lld3elf12LinkerDriver11readConfigsERN4llvm3opt12InputArgListE _ZNK4llvm3opt7ArgList15getLastArgValueENS0_12OptSpecifierENS_9StringRefE 17 _ZN4llvm3sys9MutexImpl7releaseEv __pthread_mutex_unlock 17 _ZN4llvm3sys9MutexImpl7acquireEv __pthread_mutex_lock 16 _ZL16RegisterHandlersv sigemptyset 16 _ZSt24__merge_sort_with_bufferIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPN3lld3elf13EhFrameHeaderIN4llvm6object7ELFTypeILNS5_7support10endiannessE1ELb1EEEE7FdeDataESt6vectorISC_SaISC_EEEESD_NS0_5__ops15_Iter_comp_iterIZNSB_7writeToEPhEUlRKSC_SM_E_EEEvT_SP_T0_T1_ _ZSt1...

A rebased version of the lld patch is attached. Cheers, Rafael On 31 July 2017 at 15:11, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Tobias Edler von Koch <tobias at codeaurora.org> writes: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 07/31/2017 04:20 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev wrote: >>> However, do we need to start with