search for: __physical_mask

...d_identity_map(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) /* Locates and clears a region for a new top level page table. */ void initialize_identity_maps(void) { - /* If running as an SEV guest, the encryption mask is required. */ - set_sev_encryption_mask(); - /* Exclude the encryption mask from __PHYSICAL_MASK */ physical_mask &= ~sme_me_mask; -- 2.28.0

...pmd_index(address)) #define pmd_none(x) (!pmd_val(x)) #define pmd_present(x) (pmd_val(x) & _PAGE_PRESENT) -#define pmd_clear(xp) do { set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0)); } while (0) #define pfn_pmd(nr,prot) (__pmd(((nr) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))) #define pmd_pfn(x) ((pmd_val(x) & __PHYSICAL_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT) @@ -362,19 +372,20 @@ static inline int pmd_large(pmd_t pte) { /* physical address -> PTE */ static inline pte_t mk_pte_phys(unsigned long physpage, pgprot_t pgprot) { - pte_t pte; - pte_val(pte) = physpage | pgprot_val(pgprot); - pte_val(pte) &= __supported_pte_...

...pmd_index(address)) #define pmd_none(x) (!pmd_val(x)) #define pmd_present(x) (pmd_val(x) & _PAGE_PRESENT) -#define pmd_clear(xp) do { set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0)); } while (0) #define pfn_pmd(nr,prot) (__pmd(((nr) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))) #define pmd_pfn(x) ((pmd_val(x) & __PHYSICAL_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT) @@ -362,19 +372,20 @@ static inline int pmd_large(pmd_t pte) { /* physical address -> PTE */ static inline pte_t mk_pte_phys(unsigned long physpage, pgprot_t pgprot) { - pte_t pte; - pte_val(pte) = physpage | pgprot_val(pgprot); - pte_val(pte) &= __supported_pte_...

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do

Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it

This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it

...pmd_index(address)) #define pmd_none(x) (!pmd_val(x)) #define pmd_present(x) (pmd_val(x) & _PAGE_PRESENT) -#define pmd_clear(xp) do { set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0)); } while (0) #define pfn_pmd(nr,prot) (__pmd(((nr) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))) #define pmd_pfn(x) ((pmd_val(x) & __PHYSICAL_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT) @@ -362,19 +370,20 @@ static inline int pmd_large(pmd_t pte) { /* physical address -> PTE */ static inline pte_t mk_pte_phys(unsigned long physpage, pgprot_t pgprot) { - pte_t pte; - pte_val(pte) = physpage | pgprot_val(pgprot); - pte_val(pte) &= __supported_pte_...

...pmd_index(address)) #define pmd_none(x) (!pmd_val(x)) #define pmd_present(x) (pmd_val(x) & _PAGE_PRESENT) -#define pmd_clear(xp) do { set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0)); } while (0) #define pfn_pmd(nr,prot) (__pmd(((nr) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))) #define pmd_pfn(x) ((pmd_val(x) & __PHYSICAL_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT) @@ -362,19 +370,20 @@ static inline int pmd_large(pmd_t pte) { /* physical address -> PTE */ static inline pte_t mk_pte_phys(unsigned long physpage, pgprot_t pgprot) { - pte_t pte; - pte_val(pte) = physpage | pgprot_val(pgprot); - pte_val(pte) &= __supported_pte_...

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT