search for: __nvkm_pmu_memx_h__

...;base, (b), (o), (r)) #endif diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c index e6f7416..c58a51d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ #ifndef __NVKM_PMU_MEMX_H__ #define __NVKM_PMU_MEMX_H__ #include "priv.h" +#include <subdev/bios.h> +#include <subdev/bios/init.h> +#include <subdev/bios/ramcfg.h> struct nvkm_memx { struct nvkm_pmu *pmu; @@ -200,4 +203,67 @@ nvkm_memx_unblock(struct nvkm_memx *memx) nvkm_debug(&memx-&...

No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init

Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern

...mu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c index 7b052879af72..22eaebefced3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT #ifndef __NVKM_PMU_MEMX_H__ #define __NVKM_PMU_MEMX_H__ #include "priv.h" diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/priv.h index e9c6f9725afe..26d73f9cd6d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/priv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subd...