Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__low".
Did you mean:
a_low
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2013 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer puzzle
...ple, here is a simple loop with llvm.loop.parallel and llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata:
loop.body: ; preds = %loop.body, %loop.body.lr.ph
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %4, %loop.body.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %loop.body ]
%__index.addr.07 = phi i32 [ %__low, %loop.body.lr.ph ], [ %7, %loop.body ]
%ref1 = load i32*** %3, align 8, !llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access !0
%5 = load i32** %ref1, align 8, !llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access !0
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %5, i64 %indvars.iv
%6 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
store i32 %6, i32* %ar...
2013 May 23
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer puzzle
On May 23, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 14:52, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:
> I would like us to grow a few annotations, among others, one to force vectorization irrespective whether the loop vectorizer thinks it is beneficial or not - however, this is future music.
>
> Isn't that part