Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "__lock_is_held".
2014 Nov 17
0
kworker/u16:57: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x284000
...es_nodemask+0x81e/0xc30
[<c04e4b65>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x45/0x150
[<c05b81c8>] new_slab+0x258/0x3a0
[<c05b9490>] __slab_alloc.constprop.55+0x5f0/0x790
[<c0b34636>] ? restore_all+0xf/0xf
[<c0755622>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x22/0x90
[<c04a9728>] ? __lock_is_held+0x48/0x70
[<c05bac55>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x295/0x3c0
[<c0755622>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x22/0x90
[<c0755622>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x22/0x90
[<c0755e7c>] __radix_tree_create+0x6c/0x1c0
[<c0756009>] radix_tree_insert+0x39/0xe0
[<c077ae59>] add_dma_entry+0...
2018 Aug 05
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
...x1f/0x30
[ 46.166857] ? mark_held_locks+0xd5/0x170
[ 46.166867] ? net_rx_action+0x2aa/0x10e0
[ 46.166882] net_rx_action+0x4bc/0x10e0
[ 46.166906] ? napi_complete_done+0x480/0x480
[ 46.166925] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280
[ 46.166935] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[ 46.166952] ? __lock_is_held+0xcb/0x1a0
[ 46.166982] __do_softirq+0x2c4/0xdf4
[ 46.167010] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
[ 46.167031] </IRQ>
[ 46.167038] ? virtnet_napi_enable+0x37/0xa0 [virtio_net]
[ 46.167044] do_softirq.part.11+0x69/0x70
[ 46.167065] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1d9/0x250
[ 46.167076]...
2018 Aug 05
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
...x1f/0x30
[ 46.166857] ? mark_held_locks+0xd5/0x170
[ 46.166867] ? net_rx_action+0x2aa/0x10e0
[ 46.166882] net_rx_action+0x4bc/0x10e0
[ 46.166906] ? napi_complete_done+0x480/0x480
[ 46.166925] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280
[ 46.166935] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[ 46.166952] ? __lock_is_held+0xcb/0x1a0
[ 46.166982] __do_softirq+0x2c4/0xdf4
[ 46.167010] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
[ 46.167031] </IRQ>
[ 46.167038] ? virtnet_napi_enable+0x37/0xa0 [virtio_net]
[ 46.167044] do_softirq.part.11+0x69/0x70
[ 46.167065] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1d9/0x250
[ 46.167076]...
2018 Aug 05
0
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
...k_held_locks+0xd5/0x170
> [?? 46.166867]? ? net_rx_action+0x2aa/0x10e0
> [?? 46.166882]? net_rx_action+0x4bc/0x10e0
> [?? 46.166906]? ? napi_complete_done+0x480/0x480
> [?? 46.166925]? ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280
> [?? 46.166935]? ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
> [?? 46.166952]? ? __lock_is_held+0xcb/0x1a0
> [?? 46.166982]? __do_softirq+0x2c4/0xdf4
> [?? 46.167010]? do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
> [?? 46.167031]? </IRQ>
> [?? 46.167038]? ? virtnet_napi_enable+0x37/0xa0 [virtio_net]
> [?? 46.167044]? do_softirq.part.11+0x69/0x70
> [?? 46.167065]? __local_bh_enable_i...
2018 Jul 25
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
Series:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even
2018 Jul 25
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
Series:
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even
2013 Jan 03
2
3.8-rc2: EFI framebuffer lock inversion...
.../0x5f0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1193, comm: Xorg Not tainted 3.8.0-rc2-expert #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8154f6c6>] print_circular_bug+0x28e/0x29f
[<ffffffff8108ff10>] validate_chain.isra.33+0x1000/0x10d0
[<ffffffff81090a61>] __lock_acquire+0x3a1/0xb60
[<ffffffff8108d3a4>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff810916ea>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70
[<ffffffff810697c1>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x51/0xc0
[<ffffffff81557ad7>] down_read+0x47/0x5c
[<ffffffff810697c1>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x51/0xc0
[<ffffffff810697c1>] __blocking_notifier_...
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v2 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Made
some important changes to the refactoring patch, but everything else is
the same.
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau: s/nouveau_backlight_exit/nouveau_backlight_fini/
drm/nouveau: Cleanup indenting in
2018 Aug 23
6
[PATCH 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
This series fixes some issues with nouveau's backlight support that were
causing kernel panics on module reloads, specifically on systems with
nouveau handling the backlight of one of the displays.
While we're at it, let's cleanup nouveau_backlight.c as well
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v3 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Added
NV_INFO_ONCE and made "Move backlight device into nouveau_connector" use
that instead so we don't print the GMUX warning more then once.
Lyude Paul (5):
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2018 Aug 29
6
[PATCH RESEND v3 0/6] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Forgot to send 6 patches instead of five since there's one new one now,
whoops!
No actual changes, next version of
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/
Lyude Paul (6):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2015 Feb 06
0
[PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
....613469] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2019 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3184)
[ 161.613469] change_page_attr_set_clr (arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:1394)
[ 161.613469] ? debug_object_deactivate (lib/debugobjects.c:463)
[ 161.613469] set_memory_rw (arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:1662)
[ 161.613469] ? __lock_is_held (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3518)
[ 161.613469] bpf_jit_free (include/linux/filter.h:377 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:991)
[ 161.613469] bpf_prog_free_deferred (kernel/bpf/core.c:646)
[ 161.613469] process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2014 include/linux/jump_label.h:114 include/trace/events/workque...
2015 Feb 06
0
[PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
....613469] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2019 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3184)
[ 161.613469] change_page_attr_set_clr (arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:1394)
[ 161.613469] ? debug_object_deactivate (lib/debugobjects.c:463)
[ 161.613469] set_memory_rw (arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:1662)
[ 161.613469] ? __lock_is_held (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3518)
[ 161.613469] bpf_jit_free (include/linux/filter.h:377 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:991)
[ 161.613469] bpf_prog_free_deferred (kernel/bpf/core.c:646)
[ 161.613469] process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2014 include/linux/jump_label.h:114 include/trace/events/workque...
2018 Sep 06
7
[PATCH v4 0/6] Backlight fixes and cleanup
Refactor for Ben, hopefully this time this should apply to his tree.
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/
No changes otherwise.
Lyude Paul (6):
drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants
drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector
drm/nouveau:
2013 Jul 01
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix locking in nouveau_crtc_page_flip
...veau]
[<ffffffffa034745f>] nouveau_bo_move+0xb9/0x3cb [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa01979e3>] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x24e/0x6b0 [ttm]
[<ffffffffa01989fa>] ? ttm_bo_mem_space+0x18e/0x3e1 [ttm]
[<ffffffffa0198da4>] ttm_bo_move_buffer+0x157/0x164 [ttm]
[<ffffffff810b5966>] ? __lock_is_held+0x4f/0x63
[<ffffffffa0198e51>] ttm_bo_validate+0xa0/0x129 [ttm]
[<ffffffffa0347c80>] nouveau_bo_validate+0x1c/0x1e [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa0347d52>] nouveau_ttm_fault_reserve_notify+0xd0/0xd7 [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa019abad>] ttm_bo_vm_fault+0x69/0x394 [ttm]
[<ffffffff8114...
2013 Feb 05
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix lockdep splat in display
...0-rc6-expert+ #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8108fde2>] validate_chain.isra.33+0xd72/0x10d0
[<ffffffff8105fa08>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x58/0x80
[<ffffffff8100575d>] ? print_context_stack+0x5d/0xd0
[<ffffffff81090bc1>] __lock_acquire+0x3a1/0xb60
[<ffffffff8108d504>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff8109184a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70
[<ffffffffa016c323>] ? nouveau_instobj_create_+0x43/0x90 [nouveau]
[<ffffffff81558739>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x340
[<ffffffffa016c323>] ? nouveau_instobj_create_+0x43/0x90 [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa0152370>] ? nou...
2019 Apr 09
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/i2c: Disable i2c bus access after ->fini()
...0000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
g94_i2c_aux_xfer+0x326/0x850 [nouveau]
nvkm_i2c_aux_i2c_xfer+0x9e/0x140 [nouveau]
__i2c_transfer+0x14b/0x620
i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated+0x159/0x680
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1/0x60
? rt_mutex_slowlock.constprop.0+0x13d/0x1e0
? __lock_is_held+0x59/0xa0
__i2c_smbus_xfer+0x138/0x5a0
i2c_smbus_xfer+0x4f/0x80
i2cdev_ioctl_smbus+0x162/0x2d0 [i2c_dev]
i2cdev_ioctl+0x1db/0x2c0 [i2c_dev]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x408/0x750
ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49...
2019 Apr 03
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/i2c: Disable i2c bus access after ->fini()
...0000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
g94_i2c_aux_xfer+0x326/0x850 [nouveau]
nvkm_i2c_aux_i2c_xfer+0x9e/0x140 [nouveau]
__i2c_transfer+0x14b/0x620
i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated+0x159/0x680
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1/0x60
? rt_mutex_slowlock.constprop.0+0x13d/0x1e0
? __lock_is_held+0x59/0xa0
__i2c_smbus_xfer+0x138/0x5a0
i2c_smbus_xfer+0x4f/0x80
i2cdev_ioctl_smbus+0x162/0x2d0 [i2c_dev]
i2cdev_ioctl+0x1db/0x2c0 [i2c_dev]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x408/0x750
ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49...
2019 Apr 11
1
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/i2c: Disable i2c bus access after ->fini()
...aux_xfer+0x326/0x850 [nouveau]
> > nvkm_i2c_aux_i2c_xfer+0x9e/0x140 [nouveau]
> > __i2c_transfer+0x14b/0x620
> > i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated+0x159/0x680
> > ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1/0x60
> > ? rt_mutex_slowlock.constprop.0+0x13d/0x1e0
> > ? __lock_is_held+0x59/0xa0
> > __i2c_smbus_xfer+0x138/0x5a0
> > i2c_smbus_xfer+0x4f/0x80
> > i2cdev_ioctl_smbus+0x162/0x2d0 [i2c_dev]
> > i2cdev_ioctl+0x1db/0x2c0 [i2c_dev]
> > do_vfs_ioctl+0x408/0x750
> > ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0...
2013 Feb 03
1
3.8-rc6: nouveau lockdep recursive lock acquisition
...0-rc6-expert+ #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8108fde2>] validate_chain.isra.33+0xd72/0x10d0
[<ffffffff8105fa08>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x58/0x80
[<ffffffff8100575d>] ? print_context_stack+0x5d/0xd0
[<ffffffff81090bc1>] __lock_acquire+0x3a1/0xb60
[<ffffffff8108d504>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff8109184a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70
[<ffffffffa016c323>] ? nouveau_instobj_create_+0x43/0x90 [nouveau]
[<ffffffff81558739>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x340
[<ffffffffa016c323>] ? nouveau_instobj_create_+0x43/0x90 [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa0152370>] ? nou...