search for: __local_save_flags

Hi. This patchset is preparation patches for ia64/pv_ops support. They are almost trivial and mainly make kernel paravirtualization friendly. thanks, Diffstat: arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c | 1 - include/asm-ia64/intrinsics.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/asm-ia64/mmu_context.h | 6 +----- include/asm-ia64/smp.h | 2 ++ include/asm-ia64/system.h | 10 ++++++++-- 5 files

...stinsn, unsigned len); + void (*cpuid)(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx); @@ -108,10 +117,6 @@ static inline void sync_core(void) #define read_cr4_safe(x) paravirt_ops.read_cr4_safe() #define write_cr4(x) paravirt_ops.write_cr4(x) -#define __local_save_flags() paravirt_ops.save_fl() -#define __local_irq_restore(f) paravirt_ops.restore_fl(f) -#define local_irq_disable() paravirt_ops.irq_disable() -#define local_irq_enable() paravirt_ops.irq_enable() #define safe_halt() paravirt_ops.safe_halt() #define halt() paravirt_ops.halt() #define wbinvd() parav...

...stinsn, unsigned len); + void (*cpuid)(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx); @@ -108,10 +117,6 @@ static inline void sync_core(void) #define read_cr4_safe(x) paravirt_ops.read_cr4_safe() #define write_cr4(x) paravirt_ops.write_cr4(x) -#define __local_save_flags() paravirt_ops.save_fl() -#define __local_irq_restore(f) paravirt_ops.restore_fl(f) -#define local_irq_disable() paravirt_ops.irq_disable() -#define local_irq_enable() paravirt_ops.irq_enable() #define safe_halt() paravirt_ops.safe_halt() #define halt() paravirt_ops.halt() #define wbinvd() parav...

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops