Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "__libc_secure_getenv".
1998 May 26
0
Re: Beware of dangerous enviroment (Re: Overflows in minicom)
...y they
were safe...
<<<patch for 5.4.44>>>
--- libc-5.4.44/libc/dl-malloc/malloc.c.secenv Sun Nov 2 03:48:44 1997
+++ libc-5.4.44/libc/dl-malloc/malloc.c Sat May 16 15:28:14 1998
@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@
#include <stdio.h> /* needed for malloc_stats */
+extern char *__libc_secure_getenv(const char *);
+
/*
Compile-time options
@@ -3365,15 +3367,15 @@
if(__libc_malloc_initialized) return;
__libc_malloc_initialized = 1;
- if((s = getenv("MALLOC_TRIM_THRESHOLD_")))
+ if((s = __libc_secure_getenv("MALLOC_TRIM_THRESHOLD_")))
mALLOPt(M_TRIM_THRES...
1998 May 30
9
"Flavors of Security Through Obscurity"
This was posted not too long ago on sci.crypt... Enjoy... I think the most
relevant information is near the top, but it''s all quite good... :-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the
same information can be viewed as data in one context and as
algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that
encryption algorithms