Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "__join".
2009 Mar 30
4
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
2009/3/30 someguy
<just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>
>
> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
> function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
>
It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of
building a new instruction (in this case intrinsic) you will be building
complex function calls and therefore making much more changes to the
existing front-end of your existing language if you want i...
2009 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> 2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr>
>
>> Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM
>> or .Net extension for suppor...
2009 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
Hi Nicolas,
2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr>
> Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM
> or .Net extension for supporting your new intrinsics? Or are you just
> looking for a runtime with a GC?
At the moment I am not looking to add any new extensions to JVM or .NET. I
would need a runtime with a GC to demonstrate and test
2009 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
...009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com>
> 2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>
> >
>
>> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
>> function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
>>
> It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of
> building a new instruction (in this case intrinsic) you will be building
> complex function calls and therefore making much more changes to the
> existing front-end of your existin...
2009 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
...of the issues
that concern you might not be as bad as you think.
On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Milos Puzovic wrote:
> 2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com>
> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics?
> Insert function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
> It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of
> building a new instruction (in this case intrinsic) you will be
> building complex function calls and therefore making much more
> changes to the existing front-end of your existing l...