Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__isolate_free_page".
2016 Jun 16
1
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
...d retest?
> >
> > [1] mm/compaction: split freepages without holding the zone lock
>
> ok, so this is not related to zsmalloc. finally manged to reproduce
> it. will fork a separate thread.
The reason I mentioned [1] is that it seems to have a bug.
isolate_freepages_block
__isolate_free_page
if(!zone_watermark_ok())
return 0;
list_add_tail(&page->lru, freelist);
However, the page is not isolated.
Joonsoo?
2016 Jun 16
1
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
...d retest?
> >
> > [1] mm/compaction: split freepages without holding the zone lock
>
> ok, so this is not related to zsmalloc. finally manged to reproduce
> it. will fork a separate thread.
The reason I mentioned [1] is that it seems to have a bug.
isolate_freepages_block
__isolate_free_page
if(!zone_watermark_ok())
return 0;
list_add_tail(&page->lru, freelist);
However, the page is not isolated.
Joonsoo?
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:22:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 13:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > >
> > > kernel: BUG: Bad page state
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:22:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 13:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > >
> > > kernel: BUG: Bad page state